Literature DB >> 19416557

Assessment of three generations of mice derived by ICSI using freeze-dried sperm.

Ming-Wen Li1, Brandon J Willis, Stephen M Griffey, Jimmy L Spearow, K C Kent Lloyd.   

Abstract

Although the derivation of mice by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using freeze-dried sperm has been demonstrated previously, a comprehensive analysis of their viability, health, and fertility has not. The purpose of the present study was to determine the extent to which ICSI using freeze-dried sperm stored at 4 degrees C for 1-2 months from mice on either an inbred (C57BL/6J) or hybrid (B6D2F1/J) genetic background results in genomic instability and/or phenotypic abnormality in mice and two generations of their progeny. Fertilization rates (number of 2-cells per injected oocytes) using ICSI of fresh and freeze-dried sperm were similar within and between mouse strains, although fewer freeze-dried sperm-derived embryos than fresh sperm-derived embryos developed to blastocysts in vitro (C57BL/6J and B6D2F1/J) and liveborn pups in vivo (B6D2F1/J only). Nevertheless, once born, mice derived by ICSI using freeze-dried sperm in both mouse strains were healthy and reproductively sound. No major differences in litter size, weaning rate, and sex ratio were noted in the two generations of progeny (F2 and F3) of ICSI-derived offspring using freeze-dried sperm compared with that in the natural mating (control) group. Further, there was no evidence that either ICSI or freeze drying induced genomic instability, as determined by microsatellite analysis of the derived mice and subsequent generations when compared with both parental genotypes, nor were there differences in the number or types of pathological changes in any of the three generations of progeny. We conclude that viable, healthy and genomically stable mice can be derived by ICSI using freeze-dried mouse sperm stored in the refrigerator for at least 2 months. Further, because freeze drying is a simpler and more economical technique compared with embryo and sperm cryopreservation, the results of this study justify additional research to continue to develop and enhance the technique for the preservation, storage, and sharing of genetically altered mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19416557      PMCID: PMC5006740          DOI: 10.1017/S0967199409005292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zygote        ISSN: 0967-1994            Impact factor:   1.442


  65 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technologies do not alter mutation frequency or spectrum.

Authors:  Lee Caperton; Patricia Murphey; Yukiko Yamazaki; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA double-strand break repair in parental chromatin of mouse zygotes, the first cell cycle as an origin of de novo mutation.

Authors:  Alwin Derijck; Godfried van der Heijden; Maud Giele; Marielle Philippens; Peter de Boer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Effect of pressure at primary drying of freeze-drying mouse sperm reproduction ability and preservation potential.

Authors:  Yosuke Kawase; Toshio Hani; Nobuo Kamada; Kou-ichi Jishage; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Standardized approach for microsatellite instability detection in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  I González-García; V Moreno; M Navarro; J Martí-Ragué; E Marcuello; C Benasco; O Campos; G Capellà; M A Peinado
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of raffinose and glycerol.

Authors:  N Tada; M Sato; J Yamanoi; T Mizorogi; K Kasai; S Ogawa
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1990-07

Review 6.  Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Geoffry N De Iuliis
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial dysfunction and chromosomal aneuploidy in the spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic males.

Authors:  Chung-Hsien Liu; Hui-Mei Tsao; Tzu-Chun Cheng; Hui-Mei Wu; Chun-Chia Huang; Chung-I Chen; David Pei-cheng Lin; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Phenotypic analysis of C57BL/6J and FVB/NJ mice generated using evaporatively dried spermatozoa.

Authors:  Ming-Wen Li; John D Biggers; Mehmet Toner; Stephen M Griffey; K C Kent Lloyd
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Emre Seli; David K Gardner; William B Schoolcraft; Odette Moffatt; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Development of normal mice from oocytes injected with freeze-dried spermatozoa.

Authors:  T Wakayama; R Yanagimachi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  6 in total

1.  Common and specific transcriptional signatures in mouse embryos and adult tissues induced by in vitro procedures.

Authors:  Sky Feuer; Xiaowei Liu; Annemarie Donjacour; Rhodel Simbulan; Emin Maltepe; Paolo Rinaudo
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Simple gamete preservation and artificial reproduction of mammals using micro-insemination techniques.

Authors:  Takehito Kaneko
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-18

3.  Effect of ICSI on gene expression and development of mouse preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  G Giritharan; M W Li; F Di Sebastiano; F De Sebastiano; F J Esteban; J A Horcajadas; K C K Lloyd; A Donjacour; E Maltepe; P F Rinaudo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Chromosomal integrity and DNA damage in freeze-dried spermatozoa.

Authors:  Hirokazu Kusakabe
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-01

5.  Sperm preservation by freeze-drying for the conservation of wild animals.

Authors:  Takehito Kaneko; Hideyuki Ito; Hidefusa Sakamoto; Manabu Onuma; Miho Inoue-Murayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  L-proline: a highly effective cryoprotectant for mouse oocyte vitrification.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Xu Xue; Jie Yan; Li-Ying Yan; Xiao-Hu Jin; Xiao-Hui Zhu; Zhi-Zhu He; Jing Liu; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.