Dilip Giri1. 1. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. girid@mskcc.org
Abstract
CONTEXT: The morphologic spectrum of mammary fibroepithelial lesions ranges from fibroadenoma, a common benign neoplasm, to phyllodes tumor, an uncommon lesion that can sometimes recur and metastasize. OBJECTIVE: To focus on problems encountered in the diagnostic evaluation of fibroepithelial tumors, highlighting the diagnostically relevant morphologic features and providing an update on the immunohistochemical profile and genetic alterations of these rare neoplasms. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search of the English-language literature identified published reports on fibroepithelial lesions, with a special focus on phyllodes tumor. The results and conclusions of these studies form the basis of this review. CONCLUSIONS: The distinction between fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor is usually not problematic, especially in excision specimens. In some cases, however, the diagnostic evaluation of fibroepithelial lesions can be challenging, especially if only limited material is available. Morphologic predictors of local recurrence of phyllodes tumor include cellularity and cytologic atypia, mitotic activity, positive margins, infiltrative borders, fibroproliferative satellite nodules, and past history of fibroadenoma. Predictors of distant metastasis include size, tumor necrosis, and stromal overgrowth. None of these parameters, however, constitutes a definite marker of malignancy. Presently, molecular and immunohistochemical techniques play a limited role in the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions.
CONTEXT: The morphologic spectrum of mammary fibroepithelial lesions ranges from fibroadenoma, a common benign neoplasm, to phyllodestumor, an uncommon lesion that can sometimes recur and metastasize. OBJECTIVE: To focus on problems encountered in the diagnostic evaluation of fibroepithelial tumors, highlighting the diagnostically relevant morphologic features and providing an update on the immunohistochemical profile and genetic alterations of these rare neoplasms. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search of the English-language literature identified published reports on fibroepithelial lesions, with a special focus on phyllodestumor. The results and conclusions of these studies form the basis of this review. CONCLUSIONS: The distinction between fibroadenoma and phyllodestumor is usually not problematic, especially in excision specimens. In some cases, however, the diagnostic evaluation of fibroepithelial lesions can be challenging, especially if only limited material is available. Morphologic predictors of local recurrence of phyllodestumor include cellularity and cytologic atypia, mitotic activity, positive margins, infiltrative borders, fibroproliferative satellite nodules, and past history of fibroadenoma. Predictors of distant metastasis include size, tumor necrosis, and stromal overgrowth. None of these parameters, however, constitutes a definite marker of malignancy. Presently, molecular and immunohistochemical techniques play a limited role in the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions.
Authors: Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Jessica L Hicks; Rajni Sharma; Russell Vang; Peter B Illei; Angelo De Marzo; Leisha A Emens; Pedram Argani Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Benjamin Y Tan; Geza Acs; Sophia K Apple; Sunil Badve; Ira J Bleiweiss; Edi Brogi; José P Calvo; David J Dabbs; Ian O Ellis; Vincenzo Eusebi; Gelareh Farshid; Stephen B Fox; Shu Ichihara; Sunil R Lakhani; Emad A Rakha; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Andrea L Richardson; Aysegul Sahin; Fernando C Schmitt; Stuart J Schnitt; Kalliopi P Siziopikou; Fernando A Soares; Gary M Tse; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Puay Hoon Tan Journal: Histopathology Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: M Yoshida; S Sekine; R Ogawa; H Yoshida; A Maeshima; Y Kanai; T Kinoshita; A Ochiai Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yedda Nunes Reis; Jonathan Yugo Maesaka; Carlos Shimizu; José Maria Soares-Júnior; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Roberto Filassi Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 2.365