BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cancer bears severe implications for pediatric patients. One immense restriction consists in a reduced level of activity due to different factors. Physical activity affects various aspects of development and can be regarded as an essential part of a child's life. In the present study physical activity in patients undergoing cancer therapy was quantified in order to determine the extent of the restriction and to provide baseline information for the assessment of possible interventions. PROCEDURE: Physical activity in 80 patients and 45 healthy children matched for age and gender was measured using the StepWatch 3 Activity Monitor (SAM, OrthoCare Innovations). RESULTS: Pediatric cancer patients, at 2,787 gait cycles (gcs) per day, were significantly less active than their healthy counterparts (8,096 gcs). Patients were significantly more active at home than during inpatient stays (3,185 gcs compared to 1,830 gcs), and patients with bone tumors were less active than those with leukemia regarding both, the amount (1,849 gcs vs. 2,992 gcs) and the intensity of activity. CONCLUSION: The present study quantified an often observed but so far hardly assessable problem. Activity in cancer patients is considerably reduced and patients with bone tumors are at increased risk from the detrimental effects of prolonged inactivity. Both our findings and the accepted fact that activity is an essential element of child development confirm the need for interventions tailored to a patient's needs and abilities during the course of treatment. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cancer bears severe implications for pediatric patients. One immense restriction consists in a reduced level of activity due to different factors. Physical activity affects various aspects of development and can be regarded as an essential part of a child's life. In the present study physical activity in patients undergoing cancer therapy was quantified in order to determine the extent of the restriction and to provide baseline information for the assessment of possible interventions. PROCEDURE: Physical activity in 80 patients and 45 healthy children matched for age and gender was measured using the StepWatch 3 Activity Monitor (SAM, OrthoCare Innovations). RESULTS:Pediatric cancerpatients, at 2,787 gait cycles (gcs) per day, were significantly less active than their healthy counterparts (8,096 gcs). Patients were significantly more active at home than during inpatient stays (3,185 gcs compared to 1,830 gcs), and patients with bone tumors were less active than those with leukemia regarding both, the amount (1,849 gcs vs. 2,992 gcs) and the intensity of activity. CONCLUSION: The present study quantified an often observed but so far hardly assessable problem. Activity in cancerpatients is considerably reduced and patients with bone tumors are at increased risk from the detrimental effects of prolonged inactivity. Both our findings and the accepted fact that activity is an essential element of child development confirm the need for interventions tailored to a patient's needs and abilities during the course of treatment. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Stanley H Hung; Anne Rankin; Naznin Virji-Babul; Sheila Pritchard; Christopher Fryer; Kristin L Campbell Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Nikolaus W Lang; Gerhard M Hobusch; Philipp T Funovics; Reinhard Windhager; Jochen G Hofstaetter Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Maxime Caru; Daniel Curnier; Ariane Levesque; Serge Sultan; Valérie Marcil; Caroline Laverdière; Daniel Sinnett; Lucia Romo; Laurence Kern Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Etan Orgel; Nicole M Mueske; Richard Sposto; Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; David R Freyer; Anna M Butturini; Steven D Mittelman Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2017-02-20
Authors: Corinna C Winter; Carsten Müller; Jendrik Hardes; Georg Gosheger; Joachim Boos; Dieter Rosenbaum Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mary C Hooke; Cheryl Rodgers; Olga Taylor; Kari M Koerner; Pauline Mitby; Ida Moore; Michael E Scheurer; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Wei Pan Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.592