Literature DB >> 19414930

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.

George S Korres1, Dimitrios G Balatsouras, Antonis Tzagaroulakis, Dimitris Kandiloros, Elisabeth Ferekidou, Stavros Korres.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is an objective sensitive test of cochlear function. The aim of this study was the evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss in a group of industrial workers, using this method in conjunction with standard puretone audiometry (PTA). One hundred and five subjects (210 ears) were included in the study. PTA, tympanometry, and DPOAEs were performed. Results were analyzed using a mixed analysis of variance model, and compared with the data of 34 normal persons of similar age and sex. We found statistically significant lower DPOAE levels in the noise-exposed group than in the control group. Additionally, the effect of frequency was significant, indicating that amplitude varied across frequency, with lower responses observed at 4 and 6 kHz, and maximum response found at 2 kHz. PTA showed a statistically significant effect of Group, owed to elevated puretone thresholds in the noise-exposed subjects, but a Frequency main effect was not found, although the interaction between Frequency and Group was statistically significant, as well as the interaction between Frequency and Ear. A main effect for Ear was found only in puretone thresholds, due to better thresholds in the left ears of the subjects, and not in DPOAE measurements. DPOAE levels were selectively affected at the higher frequencies, whereas puretone thresholds were affected at all frequencies. Direct comparison of the number of significantly affected ears between the two methods at 1, 2, and 4 kHz showed statistically significant differences at all comparisons, with more ears affected in PTA in comparison with DPOAEs at 4 kHz, whereas more ears were affected in DPOAEs at the lower frequencies (1 and 2 kHz). Therefore, it may be concluded that DPOAEs and PTA are both sensitive methods in detecting noise-induced hearing loss, with DPOAEs tending to be more sensitive at lower frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19414930     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.50695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  10 in total

Review 1.  Effects of sex and gender on adaptation to space: neurosensory systems.

Authors:  Millard F Reschke; Helen S Cohen; Jody M Cerisano; Janine A Clayton; Ronita Cromwell; Richard W Danielson; Emma Y Hwang; Candace Tingen; John R Allen; David L Tomko
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Conventional Audiometry, Extended High-Frequency Audiometry, and DPOAE for Early Diagnosis of NIHL.

Authors:  Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi; Mohammad Hossein Davari; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Abolfazl Mollasadeghi; Maryam Bahaloo; Seyyed Hesam Hashemi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

3.  Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Authors:  Anand N Mhatre; Bobby Tajudeen; Elena M Welt; Christopher Wartmann; Glenis R Long; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) as an Appropriate Tool in Assessment of Otoprotective Effects of Antioxidants in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL).

Authors:  Afsaneh Doosti; Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Azita Hajhossein Talasaz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-17

5.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions in workers exposed to noise: A review.

Authors:  Patrícia Arruda de Souza Alcarás; Débora Lüders; Denise Maria Vaz Romano França; Regina Maria Klas; Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda; Cláudia Giglio de Oliveira Gonçalves
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10

7.  Effect of personal music system use on sacculocollic reflex assessed by cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Niraj Kumar Singh; Chithra Sobha Sasidharan
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in college music majors and nonmusic majors.

Authors:  Rebecca L Warner Henning; Kate Bobholz
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 9.  Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.

Authors:  Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Antonio Gilardi; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Effects of Oxygen Therapies in Experimental Acute Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Nazim Ata; Erkan Kahraman; Armagan Incesulu; Engin Yildirim
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.017

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.