BACKGROUND: The news media are often criticized for exaggerated coverage of weak science. Press releases, a source of information for many journalists, might be a source of those exaggerations. OBJECTIVE: To characterize research press releases from academic medical centers. DESIGN: Content analysis. SETTING: Press releases from 10 medical centers at each extreme of U.S. News & World Report's rankings for medical research. MEASUREMENTS: Press release quality. RESULTS: Academic medical centers issued a mean of 49 press releases annually. Among 200 randomly selected releases analyzed in detail, 87 (44%) promoted animal or laboratory research, of which 64 (74%) explicitly claimed relevance to human health. Among 95 releases about primary human research, 22 (23%) omitted study size and 32 (34%) failed to quantify results. Among all 113 releases about human research, few (17%) promoted studies with the strongest designs (randomized trials or meta-analyses). Forty percent reported on the most limited human studies--those with uncontrolled interventions, small samples (<30 participants), surrogate primary outcomes, or unpublished data--yet 58% lacked the relevant cautions. LIMITATION: The effects of press release quality on media coverage were not directly assessed. CONCLUSION: Press releases from academic medical centers often promote research that has uncertain relevance to human health and do not provide key facts or acknowledge important limitations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND: The news media are often criticized for exaggerated coverage of weak science. Press releases, a source of information for many journalists, might be a source of those exaggerations. OBJECTIVE: To characterize research press releases from academic medical centers. DESIGN: Content analysis. SETTING: Press releases from 10 medical centers at each extreme of U.S. News & World Report's rankings for medical research. MEASUREMENTS: Press release quality. RESULTS: Academic medical centers issued a mean of 49 press releases annually. Among 200 randomly selected releases analyzed in detail, 87 (44%) promoted animal or laboratory research, of which 64 (74%) explicitly claimed relevance to human health. Among 95 releases about primary human research, 22 (23%) omitted study size and 32 (34%) failed to quantify results. Among all 113 releases about human research, few (17%) promoted studies with the strongest designs (randomized trials or meta-analyses). Forty percent reported on the most limited human studies--those with uncontrolled interventions, small samples (<30 participants), surrogate primary outcomes, or unpublished data--yet 58% lacked the relevant cautions. LIMITATION: The effects of press release quality on media coverage were not directly assessed. CONCLUSION: Press releases from academic medical centers often promote research that has uncertain relevance to human health and do not provide key facts or acknowledge important limitations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Frank T Leone; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; David Chooljian; Laura E Crotty Alexander; Frank C Detterbeck; Michelle N Eakin; Sarah Evers-Casey; Harold J Farber; Patricia Folan; Hasmeena Kathuria; Karen Latzka; Shane McDermott; Sharon McGrath-Morrow; Farzad Moazed; Alfred Munzer; Enid Neptune; Smita Pakhale; David P L Sachs; Jonathan Samet; Beth Sufian; Dona Upson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Matt Oxman; Lillebeth Larun; Giordano Pérez Gaxiola; Dima Alsaid; Anila Qasim; Christopher James Rose; Karin Bischoff; Andrew David Oxman Journal: F1000Res Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Conrad V Fernandez; Kathleen Ruccione; Robert J Wells; Jay B Long; Wendy Pelletier; Mary C Hooke; Rebecca D Pentz; Robert B Noll; Justin N Baker; Maura O'Leary; Gregory Reaman; Peter C Adamson; Steven Joffe Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amélie Yavchitz; Isabelle Boutron; Aida Bafeta; Ibrahim Marroun; Pierre Charles; Jean Mantz; Philippe Ravaud Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 11.069