CONTEXT: Schizophrenia is a brain disorder with predominantly genetic risk factors, and previous research has identified heritable cortical and subcortical reductions in local brain volume. To our knowledge, cortical thickness, a measure of particular interest in schizophrenia, has not previously been evaluated in terms of its heritability in relationship to risk for schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the distribution and heritability of cortical thickness changes in schizophrenia. DESIGN: We analyzed a large sample of normal controls, affected patients, and unaffected siblings using a surface-based approach. Cortical thickness was compared between diagnosis groups on a surfacewide node-by-node basis. Heritability related to disease risk was assessed in regions derived from an automated cortical parcellation algorithm by calculating the Risch lambda. SETTING: Research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-six normal controls, 115 affected patients with schizophrenia, and 192 unaffected siblings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Regional cortical thickness. RESULTS: Node-by-node mapping statistics revealed widespread thickness reductions in the patient group, most pronouncedly in the frontal lobe and temporal cortex. Unaffected siblings did not significantly differ from normal controls at the chosen conservative threshold. Risch lambda analysis revealed widespread evidence for heritability for cortical thickness reductions throughout the brain. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study provides the first evidence of broadly distributed and heritable reductions of cortical thickness alterations in schizophrenia. However, since only trend-level reductions of thickness were observed in siblings, cortical thickness per se (at least as measured by this approach) is not a strong intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia.
CONTEXT: Schizophrenia is a brain disorder with predominantly genetic risk factors, and previous research has identified heritable cortical and subcortical reductions in local brain volume. To our knowledge, cortical thickness, a measure of particular interest in schizophrenia, has not previously been evaluated in terms of its heritability in relationship to risk for schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the distribution and heritability of cortical thickness changes in schizophrenia. DESIGN: We analyzed a large sample of normal controls, affected patients, and unaffected siblings using a surface-based approach. Cortical thickness was compared between diagnosis groups on a surfacewide node-by-node basis. Heritability related to disease risk was assessed in regions derived from an automated cortical parcellation algorithm by calculating the Risch lambda. SETTING: Research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-six normal controls, 115 affected patients with schizophrenia, and 192 unaffected siblings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Regional cortical thickness. RESULTS: Node-by-node mapping statistics revealed widespread thickness reductions in the patient group, most pronouncedly in the frontal lobe and temporal cortex. Unaffected siblings did not significantly differ from normal controls at the chosen conservative threshold. Risch lambda analysis revealed widespread evidence for heritability for cortical thickness reductions throughout the brain. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study provides the first evidence of broadly distributed and heritable reductions of cortical thickness alterations in schizophrenia. However, since only trend-level reductions of thickness were observed in siblings, cortical thickness per se (at least as measured by this approach) is not a strong intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia.
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Florent Ségonne; Bruce Fischl; Brian T Quinn; Bradford C Dickerson; Deborah Blacker; Randy L Buckner; Anders M Dale; R Paul Maguire; Bradley T Hyman; Marilyn S Albert; Ronald J Killiany Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M F Egan; T E Goldberg; B S Kolachana; J H Callicott; C M Mazzanti; R E Straub; D Goldman; D R Weinberger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pamela DeRosse; George C Nitzburg; Toshikazu Ikuta; Bart D Peters; Anil K Malhotra; Philip R Szeszko Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Tina Kapur; Steve Pieper; Ross Whitaker; Stephen Aylward; Marianna Jakab; Will Schroeder; Ron Kikinis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elizabeth C Leritz; David H Salat; Victoria J Williams; David M Schnyer; James L Rudolph; Lewis Lipsitz; Bruce Fischl; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Eric Plitman; Shinichiro Nakajima; Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval; Philip Gerretsen; M Mallar Chakravarty; Jane Kobylianskii; Jun Ku Chung; Fernando Caravaggio; Yusuke Iwata; Gary Remington; Ariel Graff-Guerrero Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Suena H Massey; Daniel Stern; Eva C Alden; Julie E Petersen; Derin J Cobia; Lei Wang; John G Csernansky; Matthew J Smith Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kevin F Casey; Mariya V Cherkasova; Kevin Larcher; Alan C Evans; Glen B Baker; Alain Dagher; Chawki Benkelfat; Marco Leyton Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Anderson M Winkler; Peter Kochunov; John Blangero; Laura Almasy; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox; Ravindranath Duggirala; David C Glahn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 6.556