Literature DB >> 19414677

Connective tissue-activating peptide III: a novel blood biomarker for early lung cancer detection.

John Yee1, Marianne D Sadar, Don D Sin, Michael Kuzyk, Li Xing, Jennifer Kondra, Annette McWilliams, S F Paul Man, Stephen Lam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are no reliable blood biomarkers to detect early lung cancer. We used a novel strategy that allows discovery of differentially present proteins against a complex and variable background.
METHODS: Mass spectrometry analyses of paired pulmonary venous-radial arterial blood from 16 lung cancer patients were applied to identify plasma proteins potentially derived from the tumor microenvironment. Two differentially expressed proteins were confirmed in 64 paired venous-arterial blood samples using an immunoassay. Twenty-eight pre- and postsurgical resection peripheral blood samples and two independent, blinded sets of plasma from 149 participants in a lung cancer screening study (49 lung cancers and 100 controls) and 266 participants from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Lung Health Study (45 lung cancer and 221 matched controls) determined the accuracy of the two protein markers to detect subclinical lung cancer.
RESULTS: Connective tissue-activating peptide III (CTAP III)/ neutrophil activating protein-2 (NAP-2) and haptoglobin were identified to be significantly higher in venous than in arterial blood. CTAP III/NAP-2 levels decreased after tumor resection (P = .01). In two independent population cohorts, CTAP III/NAP-2 was significantly associated with lung cancer and improved the accuracy of a lung cancer risk prediction model that included age, smoking, lung function (FEV(1)), and an interaction term between FEV(1) and CTAP III/NAP-2 (area under the curve, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.91) compared to CAPIII/NAP-2 alone.
CONCLUSION: We identified CTAP III/NAP-2 as a novel biomarker to detect preclinical lung cancer. The study underscores the importance of applying blood biomarkers as part of a multimodal lung cancer risk prediction model instead of as stand-alone tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19414677      PMCID: PMC2698017          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

Review 1.  The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects.

Authors:  N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Platelet-derived CXC chemokines: old players in new games.

Authors:  E Brandt; A Ludwig; F Petersen; H D Flad
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.988

4.  Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Mark D Thornquist; Mark G Kris; Ramsey C Tate; Matt J Barnett; Lillian J Hsieh; Colin B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Up-regulation of tumor interleukin-8 expression by infiltrating macrophages: its correlation with tumor angiogenesis and patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy J W Chen; Pei-Li Yao; Ang Yuan; Tse-Ming Hong; Chia-Tung Shun; Min-Liang Kuo; Yung-Chie Lee; Pan-Chyr Yang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Clinical utility of serum amyloid A and macrophage migration inhibitory factor as serum biomarkers for the detection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Nayela Khan; Charles J Cromer; Michael Campa; Edward F Patz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Lung cancer screening: a different paradigm.

Authors:  Annette McWilliams; John Mayo; Sharyn MacDonald; Jean C leRiche; Branko Palcic; Eva Szabo; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Roentgenographically occult lung cancer. A ten-year experience.

Authors:  D A Cortese; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh; L B Woolner; M A Uhlenhopp; J M Piehler; D R Sanderson; P E Bernatz; D E Williams; W F Taylor; W S Payne; R S Fontana
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; D McGee; T Gordon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Proteomic-based identification of haptoglobin-1 precursor as a novel circulating biomarker of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  N Ahmed; G Barker; K T Oliva; P Hoffmann; C Riley; S Reeve; A I Smith; B E Kemp; M A Quinn; G E Rice
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  The grand challenge to decipher the cancer proteome.

Authors:  Samir Hanash; Ayumu Taguchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  A multiplexed serum biomarker immunoassay panel discriminates clinical lung cancer patients from high-risk individuals found to be cancer-free by CT screening.

Authors:  William L Bigbee; Vanathi Gopalakrishnan; Joel L Weissfeld; David O Wilson; Sanja Dacic; Anna E Lokshin; Jill M Siegfried
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Elevated levels of CXC chemokine connective tissue activating peptide (CTAP)-III in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Gina Lee; Brian K Gardner; David A Elashoff; Colleen M Purcell; Harpavan S Sandha; Jenny T Mao; Kostyantyn Krysan; Jay M Lee; Steven M Dubinett
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Lung cancer risk prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal And Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial models and validation.

Authors:  C Martin Tammemagi; Paul F Pinsky; Neil E Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Thomas L Riley; John Commins; Martin M Oken; Christine D Berg; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Emerging molecular biomarkers--blood-based strategies to detect and monitor cancer.

Authors:  Samir M Hanash; Christina S Baik; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Application of proteomics to cancer early detection.

Authors:  Samir Hanash; Ayumu Taguchi
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  Lung cancer signatures in plasma based on proteome profiling of mouse tumor models.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Katerina Politi; Sharon J Pitteri; William W Lockwood; Vitor M Faça; Karen Kelly-Spratt; Chee-Hong Wong; Qing Zhang; Alice Chin; Kwon-Sik Park; Gary Goodman; Adi F Gazdar; Julien Sage; Daniela M Dinulescu; Raju Kucherlapati; Ronald A Depinho; Christopher J Kemp; Harold E Varmus; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Applying mass spectrometry based proteomic technology to advance the understanding of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Johann Micallef; Moyez Dharsee; Jian Chen; Suzanne Ackloo; Ken Evans; Luqui Qiu; Hong Chang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Integrative and comparative genomics analysis of early hepatocellular carcinoma differentiated from liver regeneration in young and old.

Authors:  Dilek Colak; Muhammad A Chishti; Al-Bandary Al-Bakheet; Ahmed Al-Qahtani; Mohamed M Shoukri; Malcolm H Goyns; Pinar T Ozand; John Quackenbush; Ben H Park; Namik Kaya
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.