INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of drug candidates in in-vitro assays of action potential duration (APD) is one component of preclinical safety assessment. Current assays are limited by technically-demanding, time-consuming electrophysiological methods. This study aimed to assess whether a voltage-sensitive dye-based assay could be used instead. METHODS: Optical APs were recorded using di-4-ANEPPS in electrically field stimulated beagle left ventricular midmyocardial myocytes (LVMMs). Pharmacological properties of di-4-ANEPPS on the main cardiac ion channels that shape the ventricular AP were investigated using IonWorks and conventional electrophysiology. Effects of 9 reference drugs (dofetilide, E4031, D-sotalol, ATXII, cisapride, terfenadine, alfuzosin, diltiazem and pinacidil) with known APD-modulating effects were assessed on optically measured APD at 1 Hz. RESULTS: Under optimum conditions, 0.1 microM di-4-ANEPPS could be used to monitor APs paced at 1 Hz during nine, 5 s exposures without altering APD. di-4-ANEPPS had no effect on either hI(ERG), hI(Na), hI(Ks) and hI(to) currents in transfected CHO cells (up to 10 microM) or I(Ca,L) current in LVMMs (at 16 microM). di-4-ANEPPS had no effect on APs recorded with microelectrodes at 1 or 0.5 Hz over a period of 30 min di-4-ANEPPS displayed the sensitivity to record changes in optically measured APD in response to altered pacing frequencies and sequential vehicle additions did not affect the optically measured APD. APD data obtained with 9 reference drugs were as expected except (i) D-sotalol-induced increases in duration were smaller than those caused by other I(Kr) blockers and (ii) increases in APD were not detected using low concentrations of terfenadine. DISCUSSION: Early in drug discovery, the di-4-ANEPPS-based method can reliably be used to assess drug effects on APD as part of a cardiac risk assessment strategy.
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of drug candidates in in-vitro assays of action potential duration (APD) is one component of preclinical safety assessment. Current assays are limited by technically-demanding, time-consuming electrophysiological methods. This study aimed to assess whether a voltage-sensitive dye-based assay could be used instead. METHODS: Optical APs were recorded using di-4-ANEPPS in electrically field stimulated beagle left ventricular midmyocardial myocytes (LVMMs). Pharmacological properties of di-4-ANEPPS on the main cardiac ion channels that shape the ventricular AP were investigated using IonWorks and conventional electrophysiology. Effects of 9 reference drugs (dofetilide, E4031, D-sotalol, ATXII, cisapride, terfenadine, alfuzosin, diltiazem and pinacidil) with known APD-modulating effects were assessed on optically measured APD at 1 Hz. RESULTS: Under optimum conditions, 0.1 microM di-4-ANEPPS could be used to monitor APs paced at 1 Hz during nine, 5 s exposures without altering APD. di-4-ANEPPS had no effect on either hI(ERG), hI(Na), hI(Ks) and hI(to) currents in transfected CHO cells (up to 10 microM) or I(Ca,L) current in LVMMs (at 16 microM). di-4-ANEPPS had no effect on APs recorded with microelectrodes at 1 or 0.5 Hz over a period of 30 min di-4-ANEPPS displayed the sensitivity to record changes in optically measured APD in response to altered pacing frequencies and sequential vehicle additions did not affect the optically measured APD. APD data obtained with 9 reference drugs were as expected except (i) D-sotalol-induced increases in duration were smaller than those caused by other I(Kr) blockers and (ii) increases in APD were not detected using low concentrations of terfenadine. DISCUSSION: Early in drug discovery, the di-4-ANEPPS-based method can reliably be used to assess drug effects on APD as part of a cardiac risk assessment strategy.
Authors: Mark Warren; Kenneth W Spitzer; Bruce W Steadman; Tyler D Rees; Paul Venable; Tyson Taylor; Junko Shibayama; Ping Yan; Joseph P Wuskell; Leslie M Loew; Alexey V Zaitsev Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Kunhua Song; Young-Jae Nam; Xiang Luo; Xiaoxia Qi; Wei Tan; Guo N Huang; Asha Acharya; Christopher L Smith; Michelle D Tallquist; Eric G Neilson; Joseph A Hill; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sharon A George; Patrick J Calhoun; Robert G Gourdie; James W Smyth; Steven Poelzing Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Marina Ronzhina; Tibor Stracina; Lubica Lacinova; Katarina Ondacova; Michaela Pavlovicova; Lucie Marsanova; Radovan Smisek; Oto Janousek; Katerina Fialova; Jana Kolarova; Marie Novakova; Ivo Provaznik Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 4.566