OBJECTIVE: Focus group research is often seen as a cost-effective way of gathering evidence from multiple research participants about the diversity of their views, experiences or beliefs. Our objective is to argue that focus group research only fulfils its potential if analysis of individual views is extended to include analysis of interaction between participants, so that we learn more why people hold these views. APPROACH: We outline the literature on focus group research, contrasting the 'quick-and-easy' approach with the demands of studies that are designed, conducted and analysed in a methodologically rigorous way to yield high quality public health evidence. CONCLUSION: Well-conducted focus groups contribute good evidence for public health decision making. The challenges of conducting high-quality studies should not be underestimated, and must involve rigorous analysis of both interaction and content.
OBJECTIVE: Focus group research is often seen as a cost-effective way of gathering evidence from multiple research participants about the diversity of their views, experiences or beliefs. Our objective is to argue that focus group research only fulfils its potential if analysis of individual views is extended to include analysis of interaction between participants, so that we learn more why people hold these views. APPROACH: We outline the literature on focus group research, contrasting the 'quick-and-easy' approach with the demands of studies that are designed, conducted and analysed in a methodologically rigorous way to yield high quality public health evidence. CONCLUSION: Well-conducted focus groups contribute good evidence for public health decision making. The challenges of conducting high-quality studies should not be underestimated, and must involve rigorous analysis of both interaction and content.
Authors: Paul J Joudrey; Benjamin J Oldfield; Kimberly A Yonkers; Patrick G O'Connor; Gretchen Berland; E Jennifer Edelman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Vanessa A Shrewsbury; Lesley A King; Libby A Hattersley; Sarah A Howlett; Louise L Hardy; Louise A Baur Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Esther M Bergman; Anique B H de Bruin; Andreas Herrler; Inge W H Verheijen; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Cees Pm van der Vleuten Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jennifer D Roberts; Sandra Mandic; Craig S Fryer; Micah L Brachman; Rashawn Ray Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Libby A Hattersley; Vanessa A Shrewsbury; Lesley A King; Sarah A Howlett; Louise L Hardy; Louise A Baur Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 6.457