Literature DB >> 19413539

Protocol-based care: the standardisation of decision-making?

Jo Rycroft-Malone1, Marina Fontenla, Kate Seers, Debra Bick.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore how protocol-based care affects clinical decision-making.
BACKGROUND: In the context of evidence-based practice, protocol-based care is a mechanism for facilitating the standardisation of care and streamlining decision-making through rationalising the information with which to make judgements and ultimately decisions. However, whether protocol-based care does, in the reality of practice, standardise decision-making is unknown. This paper reports on a study that explored the impact of protocol-based care on nurses' decision-making.
DESIGN: Theoretically informed by realistic evaluation and the promoting action on research implementation in health services framework, a case study design using ethnographic methods was used. Two sites were purposively sampled; a diabetic and endocrine unit and a cardiac medical unit.
METHODS: Within each site, data collection included observation, postobservation semi-structured interviews with staff and patients, field notes, feedback sessions and document review. Data were inductively and thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Decisions made by nurses in both sites were varied according to many different and interacting factors. While several standardised care approaches were available for use, in reality, a variety of information sources informed decision-making. The primary approach to knowledge exchange and acquisition was person-to-person; decision-making was a social activity. Rarely were standardised care approaches obviously referred to; nurses described following a mental flowchart, not necessarily linked to a particular guideline or protocol. When standardised care approaches were used, it was reported that they were used flexibly and particularised.
CONCLUSIONS: While the logic of protocol-based care is algorithmic, in the reality of clinical practice, other sources of information supported nurses' decision-making process. This has significant implications for the political goal of standardisation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The successful implementation and judicious use of tools such as protocols and guidelines will likely be dependant on approaches that facilitate the development of nurses' decision-making processes in parallel to paying attention to the influence of context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19413539     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02605.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  10 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Practice in the United States: Challenges, Progress, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2015-10-16

Review 2.  Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Christine W Nibbelink; Barbara B Brewer
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Adoption and Initial Implementation of a National Integrated Care Programme for Diabetes: A Realist Evaluation.

Authors:  Kate O'Neill; Fiona Riordan; Emmy Racine; Marsha Tracey; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Patricia M Kearney; Sheena M McHugh
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.913

4.  Nurses' Utilization of Information Resources for Patient Care Tasks: A Survey of Critical Care Nurses in an Urban Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Rebecca J L Brown; Martin Michalowski
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Laura J Damschroder; Hildi J Hagedorn; Ginger S Daggett; Anju Sahay; Mona Ritchie; Teresa Damush; Marylou Guihan; Philip M Ullrich; Cheryl B Stetler
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  What are health professionals' intentions toward using research and products of research in clinical practice? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Ben Appleby; Carolyn Roskell; William Daly
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2015-12-17

7.  "Having the compass-drawing the map": Exploring nurses' management of pain and other discomforts during use of analgosedation in intensive care.

Authors:  Helene Berntzen; Ida Torunn Bjørk; Hilde Wøien
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-12-18

8.  Impact of using data from electronic protocols in nursing performance management: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Joanna Hope; Peter Griffiths; Paul E Schmidt; Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Gary B Smith
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences.

Authors:  Debra E Bick; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Marina Fontenla
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Variation in Gentamicin Dosing and Monitoring in Pediatric Units across New South Wales.

Authors:  Vishal Saddi; John Preddy; Sarah Dalton; John Connors; Sarah Patterson
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2017-02-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.