Literature DB >> 19412933

Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Dorothea I Hollnagel1, Paul E Summers, Dimos Poulikakos, Spyros S Kollias.   

Abstract

In western populations, cerebral aneurysms develop in approximately 4% of humans and they involve the risk of rupture. Blood flow patterns are of interest for understanding the pathogenesis of the lesions and may eventually contribute to deciding on the most efficient treatment procedure for a specific patient. Velocity mapping with phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) is a non-invasive method for performing in vivo measurements on blood velocity. Several hemodynamic properties can either be derived directly from these measurements or a flow field with all its parameters can be simulated on the basis of the measurements. For both approaches, the accuracy of the PC-MRA data and subsequent modeling must be validated. Therefore, a realistic transient flow field in a well-defined patient-specific silicone phantom was investigated. Velocity investigations with PC-MRA in a 3 Tesla MR scanner, laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were performed in the same model under equal flow conditions and compared to each other. The results showed that PC-MRA was qualitatively similar to LDV and CFD, but showed notable quantitative differences, while LDV and CFD agreed well. The accuracy of velocity quantification by PC-MRA was best in straight artery regions with the measurement plane being perpendicular to the primary flow direction. The accuracy decreased in regions with disturbed flow and in cases where the measurement plane was not perpendicular to the primary flow. Due to these findings, it is appropriate to use PC-MRA as the inlet and outlet conditions for numerical simulations to calculate velocities and shear stresses in disturbed regions like aneurysms, rather than derive these values directly from the full PC-MRA measured velocity field. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19412933     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  23 in total

1.  Unenhanced dynamic MR angiography: high spatial and temporal resolution by using true FISP-based spin tagging with alternating radiofrequency.

Authors:  Lirong Yan; Sumei Wang; Yan Zhuo; Ronald L Wolf; Michael F Stiefel; Jing An; Yongquan Ye; Qian Zhang; Elias R Melhem; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.

Authors:  Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Can Wu; Julio Garcia; Ian G Murphy; Ozair A Rahman; Amir A Rahsepar; Maria Aristova; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Iman Khodarahmi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Validation of Zero TE-MRA in the Characterization of Cerebrovascular Diseases: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  S Shang; J Ye; W Dou; X Luo; J Qu; Q Zhu; H Zhang; J Wu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  A Harloff; T Zech; F Wegent; C Strecker; C Weiller; M Markl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Role of fluid dynamics and inflammation in intracranial aneurysm formation.

Authors:  Alexis S Turjman; Francis Turjman; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Inflow hemodynamics evaluated by using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging and the size ratio of unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Kazuya Futami; Iku Nambu; Tomohiro Kitabayashi; Hiroki Sano; Kouichi Misaki; Naoyuki Uchiyama; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Physical factors effecting cerebral aneurysm pathophysiology.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Parent artery curvature influences inflow zone location of unruptured sidewall internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Authors:  K Futami; H Sano; T Kitabayashi; K Misaki; M Nakada; N Uchiyama; F Ueda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.