OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of screening for cardiovascular risk factors and the effect of applying professional guidelines for risk reduction in postmenopausal women, as judged by the Framingham and the high-risk systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) methods. METHODS: 18 menopause clinics in Hungary participated in the study, enrolling a total of 2789 patients. Physicians were asked to follow professional guidelines for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Patients were requested to attend follow-up every four months for 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56.7+/-6.9 years, and the time elapsed since the last menstrual period was 9.2+/-7.2 years. Overall, 29.4% of patients attended at least one follow-up visit. At the initial visit, high total cholesterol level (>5 mmol/l) was detected in 78% of patients, high triglyceride level (>1.7 mmol/l) in 29%, high systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg) in 32%, fasting plasma glucose level>6.1 mmol/l in 15%. Increased waist circumference (>88 cm) was found in 85.8% of the patients; 18.3% of the patients smoked, which did not change. After 12 months, all laboratory parameters and the blood pressure had improved significantly. Both the Framingham and SCORE systems showed a significant improvement in the cardiovascular risk status, and the rate of metabolic syndrome had decreased significantly by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Screening postmenopausal women for cardiovascular risk and the application of professional guidelines for primary prevention may significantly reduce the risk of coronary artery disease in this group. Patient compliance with follow-up visits needs improvement.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of screening for cardiovascular risk factors and the effect of applying professional guidelines for risk reduction in postmenopausal women, as judged by the Framingham and the high-risk systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) methods. METHODS: 18 menopause clinics in Hungary participated in the study, enrolling a total of 2789 patients. Physicians were asked to follow professional guidelines for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Patients were requested to attend follow-up every four months for 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56.7+/-6.9 years, and the time elapsed since the last menstrual period was 9.2+/-7.2 years. Overall, 29.4% of patients attended at least one follow-up visit. At the initial visit, high total cholesterol level (>5 mmol/l) was detected in 78% of patients, high triglyceride level (>1.7 mmol/l) in 29%, high systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg) in 32%, fasting plasma glucose level>6.1 mmol/l in 15%. Increased waist circumference (>88 cm) was found in 85.8% of the patients; 18.3% of the patients smoked, which did not change. After 12 months, all laboratory parameters and the blood pressure had improved significantly. Both the Framingham and SCORE systems showed a significant improvement in the cardiovascular risk status, and the rate of metabolic syndrome had decreased significantly by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Screening postmenopausal women for cardiovascular risk and the application of professional guidelines for primary prevention may significantly reduce the risk of coronary artery disease in this group. Patient compliance with follow-up visits needs improvement.
Authors: Thomas A Pearson; Steven N Blair; Stephen R Daniels; Robert H Eckel; Joan M Fair; Stephen P Fortmann; Barry A Franklin; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Greenland; Scott M Grundy; Yuling Hong; Nancy Houston Miller; Ronald M Lauer; Ira S Ockene; Ralph L Sacco; James F Sallis; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lori Mosca; Noel Bairey Merz; Roger S Blumenthal; Mark J Cziraky; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Chaitanya Sarawate; Karol E Watson; Vincent J Willey; Eric J Stanek Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lori Mosca; Allison H Linfante; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Sharonne N Hayes; Brian W Walsh; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Johnny Kwan; Thomas Mills; Susan Lee Simpson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas Thom; Nancy Haase; Wayne Rosamond; Virginia J Howard; John Rumsfeld; Teri Manolio; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Katherine Flegal; Christopher O'Donnell; Steven Kittner; Donald Lloyd-Jones; David C Goff; Yuling Hong; Robert Adams; Gary Friday; Karen Furie; Philip Gorelick; Brett Kissela; John Marler; James Meigs; Veronique Roger; Stephen Sidney; Paul Sorlie; Julia Steinberger; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Matthew Wilson; Philip Wolf Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Linda S Garavalia; Carole Decker; Kimberly J Reid; Judith H Lichtman; Susmita Parashar; Viola Vaccarino; Harlan M Krumholz; John A Spertus Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Viola Vaccarino; Zhen Qiu Lin; Stanislav V Kasl; Jennifer A Mattera; Sarah A Roumanis; Jerome L Abramson; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R M Conroy; K Pyörälä; A P Fitzgerald; S Sans; A Menotti; G De Backer; D De Bacquer; P Ducimetière; P Jousilahti; U Keil; I Njølstad; R G Oganov; T Thomsen; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Tverdal; H Wedel; P Whincup; L Wilhelmsen; I M Graham Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Astrid Wallner; Alexandra Hirz; Edith Schober; Harald Harbich; Thomas Waldhoer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Endre Szigethy; Zoltán Jancsó; Csaba Móczár; István Ilyés; Eszter Kovács; László Róbert Kolozsvári; Imre Rurik Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 1.704