STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of radiographs and computed tomography in patients undergoing different surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the correction of vertebral rotation by different surgical techniques and/or anchors in the treatment of AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The technique and the technology used in the surgical treatment of AIS continue to evolve; there is little information about the comparison of the vertebral rotation correction of thoracic scoliosis by different surgical techniques and/or anchors. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 106 consecutive patients with AIS, who underwent selective thoracic fusion with different surgical techniques and/or anchors, including hooks, wires, and pedicle screws on the periapical concave side from a posterior approach and an anterior approach using screws. The selection criteria were as follows: younger than 20 years of age, thoracic scoliosis (Lenke type 1, 2, and 3), selected thoracic fusion, and a minimum 2-year follow-up period, whereas thoracic hyperkyphosis was excluded. The patients were classified into group A (anterior approach, n=27), group H (hooks, n=39), group S (screws, n=25), and group W (wires, n=15). The Cobb angle and apical vertebral rotation were evaluated by plain radiography and computed tomography, respectively, before and after surgery and after 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: All 4 groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative major curve, and curve flexibility. In all groups, the coronal Cobb angle was significantly improved after surgery, without any significant differences between the 4 groups. The Rotation Angle midline values in group A, group H, and group S were significantly improved after 2 years of follow-up (P<0.01), but not for group W. Rotation Angle sagittal was significantly improved after 2 years only in group A. Classification of each group into 2 subgroups according to the flexibility index (>0.5 and <0.5) provided Rotation Angle sagittal values that demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively (P<0.01) for group A and group S subgroups with a flexibility index >0.5. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of hooks and the wires, vertebral rotation in AIS is effectively corrected by either the anterior approach or posterior pedicle screw fixation, especially in patients with more flexible scoliosis (a flexibility index >0.5).
STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of radiographs and computed tomography in patients undergoing different surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the correction of vertebral rotation by different surgical techniques and/or anchors in the treatment of AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The technique and the technology used in the surgical treatment of AIS continue to evolve; there is little information about the comparison of the vertebral rotation correction of thoracic scoliosis by different surgical techniques and/or anchors. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 106 consecutive patients with AIS, who underwent selective thoracic fusion with different surgical techniques and/or anchors, including hooks, wires, and pedicle screws on the periapical concave side from a posterior approach and an anterior approach using screws. The selection criteria were as follows: younger than 20 years of age, thoracic scoliosis (Lenke type 1, 2, and 3), selected thoracic fusion, and a minimum 2-year follow-up period, whereas thoracic hyperkyphosis was excluded. The patients were classified into group A (anterior approach, n=27), group H (hooks, n=39), group S (screws, n=25), and group W (wires, n=15). The Cobb angle and apical vertebral rotation were evaluated by plain radiography and computed tomography, respectively, before and after surgery and after 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: All 4 groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative major curve, and curve flexibility. In all groups, the coronal Cobb angle was significantly improved after surgery, without any significant differences between the 4 groups. The Rotation Angle midline values in group A, group H, and group S were significantly improved after 2 years of follow-up (P<0.01), but not for group W. Rotation Angle sagittal was significantly improved after 2 years only in group A. Classification of each group into 2 subgroups according to the flexibility index (>0.5 and <0.5) provided Rotation Angle sagittal values that demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively (P<0.01) for group A and group S subgroups with a flexibility index >0.5. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of hooks and the wires, vertebral rotation in AIS is effectively corrected by either the anterior approach or posterior pedicle screw fixation, especially in patients with more flexible scoliosis (a flexibility index >0.5).
Authors: John G Burke; Enzo Vettorato; Gudrun Schöffmann; R Eddie Clutton; Tim S Drew; J N Alastair Gibson Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Mario Di Silvestre; Francesco Lolli; Georgios Bakaloudis; Elena Maredi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesca Pastorelli Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 3.134