Literature DB >> 19411681

Kinase mutations and efficacy of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Tae Won Kim1, Min-Hee Ryu, Heungnam Lee, Sun Jin Sym, Jae-Lyun Lee, Heung Moon Chang, Young Suk Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Won Ki Kang, Dong Bok Shin, Yung-Jue Bang, Jung Shin Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the relationship between treatment outcome and kinase mutational status in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Clinical data were collected from 113 consecutive patients with metastatic or unresectable GISTs treated with imatinib from June 2001 through June 2005 at five institutions in Korea. KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 and PDGFRA exons 12 and 18 were examined.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 57 years (range, 31-82 years). The overall response rate was 67.2%. KIT mutations were found in exon 11 (n = 92, 81.4%) and exon 9 (n = 10, 8.8%). One patient had a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation. The overall mutation rate was 91.2%. Response rates were 68.4%, 50.0%, and 80.0% in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations, KIT exon 9 mutations, and no kinase mutations, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.0 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 42.0 months and median overall survival (OS) time was not reached. PFS and OS times did not differ significantly according to KIT genotype.
CONCLUSION: This study was unable to find an association between KIT mutational status and clinical outcome of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced GISTs. There was a trend toward better outcomes for patients with wild-type KIT or exon 11 mutations compared with exon 9 mutations, although this was not statistically significant. Compared with previous studies in western populations, these results suggest that ethnic differences may influence the relationship between KIT genotype and clinical outcome to imatinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411681     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  11 in total

1.  C-KIT mutations were closely associated with the response to Imatinib in Chinese advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Yunzhi Dang; Naiping Sun; Jian Li; Lin Shen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver in an anorectal melanoma survivor: A case report.

Authors:  Yung-Yeh Su; Nai-Jung Chiang; Chun-Chieh Wu; Li-Tzong Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Sunitinib as a second-line therapy for advanced GISTs after failure of imatinib: relationship between efficacy and tumor genotype in Korean patients.

Authors:  Dok Hyun Yoon; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Moyeol Beck; Dae Ro Choi; Yoojin Cho; Jae-Lyun Lee; Heung-Moon Chang; Tae Won Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Secondary mutations of c-KIT contribute to acquired resistance to imatinib and decrease efficacy of sunitinib in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Ye Tian; Jian Li; Naiping Sun; Jiajia Yuan; Lin Shen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Clinical practice guideline for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in Korea.

Authors:  Yoon-Koo Kang; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Taesung Sohn; Dongil Choi; Hye Jin Kang; Min-Hee Ryu; Woo Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Clinical practice guideline for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in Korea.

Authors:  Yoon-Koo Kang; Hye Jin Kang; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Taesung Sohn; Dongil Choi; Min-Hee Ryu; Woo Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Practical role of mutation analysis for imatinib treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Zhi; Xiaoying Zhou; Weizhi Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Michael Stamatakos; Emmanouel Douzinas; Charikleia Stefanaki; Panagiotis Safioleas; Electra Polyzou; Georgia Levidou; Michael Safioleas
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Asian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Dong-Hoe Koo; Min-Hee Ryu; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Akira Sawaki; Seiichi Hirota; Jie Zheng; Bo Zhang; Chin-Yuan Tzen; Chun-Nan Yeh; Toshirou Nishida; Lin Shen; Li-Tzong Chen; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Clinical practice and outcomes in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Experience from an Indian tertiary care center.

Authors:  Subhadeep Bose; Anant Ramaswamy; Arvind Sahu; Omshree Shetty; Saurabh S Zanwar; Jimmy Mirani; Chaitali Nashikkar; Vikas Ostwal
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.