Literature DB >> 19411548

Electroreception in the euryhaline stingray, Dasyatis sabina.

D W McGowan1, S M Kajiura.   

Abstract

This study quantified the electrosensitivity of a euryhaline elasmobranch, the Atlantic stingray (Dasyatis sabina) across a range of salinities. Specimens from a permanent freshwater (FW) population in the St Johns River system, FL, USA, were compared with stingrays from the tidally dynamic Indian River Lagoon in east Florida, USA. Behavioral responses of stingrays to prey-simulating electric stimuli were quantified in FW (0 p.p.t., rho=2026 Omega cm), brackish (15 p.p.t., rho=41 Omega cm) and full strength seawater (35 p.p.t., rho=19 Omega cm). This study demonstrated that the electrosensitivity of D. sabina is significantly reduced in FW. In order to elicit a feeding response, stingrays tested in FW required an electric field 200-300x greater than stingrays tested in brackish and saltwater (median FW treatments=1.4 microV cm(-1), median brackish-saltwater treatments=6 nV cm(-1)), and the maximum orientation distance was reduced by 35.2%, from 44.0 cm in the brackish and saltwater treatments to 28.5 cm in FW. The St Johns River stingrays did not demonstrate an enhanced electrosensitivity in FW, nor did they exhibit reduced sensitivity when introduced to higher salinities. Stingrays from both populations responded similarly to the prey-simulating stimulus when tested at similar salinities, regardless of their native environment. The reduction in electrosensitivity and detection range in FW is attributed to both an environmental factor (electrical resistivity of the water) and the physiological function of the ampullary canals. The plasticity of this sensory system to function across such a wide environmental range demonstrates its adaptive significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411548     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.025247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

Review 1.  Freshwater elasmobranchs: a review of their physiology and biochemistry.

Authors:  James S Ballantyne; J W Robinson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Electric field detection in sawfish and shovelnose rays.

Authors:  Barbara E Wueringer; Lyle Squire; Stephen M Kajiura; Ian R Tibbetts; Nathan S Hart; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How Close is too Close? The Effect of a Non-Lethal Electric Shark Deterrent on White Shark Behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Channing A Egeberg; Nathan S Hart; Laura Ryan; Lucille Chapuis; Caroline C Kerr; Carl Schmidt; Charlie Huveneers; Enrico Gennari; Kara E Yopak; Jessica J Meeuwig; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Linking sensory biology and fisheries bycatch reduction in elasmobranch fishes: a review with new directions for research.

Authors:  Laura K Jordan; John W Mandelman; D Michelle McComb; Sonja V Fordham; John K Carlson; Timothy B Werner
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.