Literature DB >> 19411506

An evidence-based approach to the adoption of new technology.

Henry Ahn1, Mohit Bhandari, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

New orthopaedic technology is constantly being developed to help improve patient care. New technology may lead to a waste of resources or lead to harm for the patient if it is not properly evaluated before it is accepted as a standard of care. The purpose of this article is to assess how new technology can be implemented safely while maintaining an environment that allows for surgical innovation through an evidence-based approach. Although randomized controlled trials (Level-I evidence) are typically seen as the so-called gold standard with regard to treatment efficacy, randomized trials may not be the most effective form of evaluating a new technology. In many circumstances, a prospective cohort series or large registry that documents outcomes and adverse events may be more effective and practical for the evaluation of a new surgical technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411506     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

Authors:  A F Mannion; V Pittet; F Steiger; J-P Vader; H-J Becker; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.

Authors:  C D Fankhauser; U Mutter; E Aghayev; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Structural and Chemical Modification to Improve Adhesive and Material Properties of Fibrin-Genipin for Repair of Annulus Fibrosus Defects in Intervertebral Disks.

Authors:  Michelle A Cruz; Steven McAnany; Nikita Gupta; Rose G Long; Philip Nasser; David Eglin; Andrew C Hecht; Svenja Illien-Junger; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management.

Authors:  Andreas H Gomoll; Henning Madry; Gunnar Knutsen; Niek van Dijk; Romain Seil; Mats Brittberg; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Google Wave: Have CTSA-Minded Institutions Caught It?

Authors:  Amy Donahue
Journal:  Evid Based Libr Inf Pract       Date:  2010-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.