OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify racial and ethnic differences in rates of alcohol-related advice given to veterans treated in Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the VA Survey of the Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Participants were 255,522 veterans treated in VA ambulatory clinics in fiscal year 2005. SHEP measures included alcohol consumption questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and an item inquiring whether a VA clinician had given advice about drinking. Logistic regression was used to examine relationships between race and ethnicity categories and receipt of alcohol-related advice. Covariate measures included demographic characteristics and physical and mental component summary scores from the Veterans RAND Health Survey (VR-12). RESULTS: Among veterans who consumed any alcohol, compared with veterans from the other racial or ethnic groups, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander veterans were less likely to be in the medium and highest alcohol consumption categories and non-Hispanic white veterans were less likely to be in the highest alcohol consumption category (p<.001). In a model adjusting for demographic characteristics, physical and mental health status, and alcohol consumption category, among veterans who consumed any alcohol, those who were non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR]=1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.47-1.84), Hispanic (OR=1.56, CI=1.35-1.80), or non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (OR=1.56, CI=1.06-2.29) were more likely to report receiving alcohol-related advice, compared with non-Hispanic white veterans. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that veterans from certain minority groups are more likely than white veterans to report receiving alcohol-related advice in the VA, after the model is adjusted for demographic characteristics, health status, and alcohol consumption. Further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for observed differences in receipt of alcohol-related advice and the potential clinical implications.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify racial and ethnic differences in rates of alcohol-related advice given to veterans treated in Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the VA Survey of the Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Participants were 255,522 veterans treated in VA ambulatory clinics in fiscal year 2005. SHEP measures included alcohol consumption questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and an item inquiring whether a VA clinician had given advice about drinking. Logistic regression was used to examine relationships between race and ethnicity categories and receipt of alcohol-related advice. Covariate measures included demographic characteristics and physical and mental component summary scores from the Veterans RAND Health Survey (VR-12). RESULTS: Among veterans who consumed any alcohol, compared with veterans from the other racial or ethnic groups, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander veterans were less likely to be in the medium and highest alcohol consumption categories and non-Hispanic white veterans were less likely to be in the highest alcohol consumption category (p<.001). In a model adjusting for demographic characteristics, physical and mental health status, and alcohol consumption category, among veterans who consumed any alcohol, those who were non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR]=1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.47-1.84), Hispanic (OR=1.56, CI=1.35-1.80), or non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (OR=1.56, CI=1.06-2.29) were more likely to report receiving alcohol-related advice, compared with non-Hispanic white veterans. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that veterans from certain minority groups are more likely than white veterans to report receiving alcohol-related advice in the VA, after the model is adjusted for demographic characteristics, health status, and alcohol consumption. Further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for observed differences in receipt of alcohol-related advice and the potential clinical implications.
Authors: Jennifer K Manuel; Derek D Satre; Janice Tsoh; Gina Moreno-John; Jacqueline S Ramos; Elinore F McCance-Katz; Jason M Satterfield Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Joseph E Glass; Brian E Perron; Mark A Ilgen; Stephen T Chermack; Scott Ratliff; Kara Zivin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Laura J Chavez; Emily C Williams; Gwen T Lapham; Anna D Rubinsky; Daniel R Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Yun Lu; Felicia W Chi; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Verena E Metz; Constance Weisner; Derek D Satre; Cynthia I Campbell; Joseph Elson; Thekla B Ross; Sameer V Awsare; Stacy A Sterling Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-09-05 Impact factor: 3.928
Authors: Jessica A Chen; Joseph E Glass; Kara M K Bensley; Simon B Goldberg; Keren Lehavot; Emily C Williams Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-07-15