Literature DB >> 19410991

Predicting functional recovery and return to work after mutilating hand injuries: usefulness of Campbell's Hand Injury Severity Score.

Hironori Matsuzaki1, Hiroko Narisawa, Hitoshi Miwa, Satoshi Toishi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of severity and form of mutilating hand injuries on functional recovery and return to work, and the usefulness of an injury-severity score in predicting these outcomes.
METHODS: We reexamined patients in whom finger amputation or near amputation had been treated with replantation or revascularization at our institution at least 3 years earlier. We evaluated radiographs, sensory recovery, finger range of motion, skin temperature, and current overall hand function to calculate Tamai and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and recorded return-to-work status, duration of treatment, and time away from work. We determined injury level, number of involved fingers, type of injury, and Campbell's Hand Injury Severity score (HISS) from the medical record.
RESULTS: The average age of the 50 enrolled patients was 43 years (range, 18-69 years); average follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 3.1-15.3 years). More proximal injuries, more involved fingers, and more complicated injury predicted poorer functional recovery. HISS was highly correlated with Tamai's score (r = -0.77; p<.001) and moderately correlated with the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (r = 0.39; p = .009). HISS was only moderately correlated with length of treatment (r = 0.32; p<.05) and with time away from work (r = 0.34; p<.05). Mean HISS among the 3 return-to-work groups differed remarkably. When HISS was <50, 11 of 12 patients returned to their original jobs; when it was between 50 and 150, 17 of 23 patients were able to return; and when it was >150, only 4 of 15 were able to return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the current surgical care of patients with mutilated hand injuries, HISS determined at the time of injury can adequately predict functional outcome and return to work status. Larger studies will be necessary to validate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19410991     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  10 in total

1.  Repopulation of intrasynovial flexor tendon allograft with bone marrow stromal cells: an ex vivo model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ozasa; Peter C Amadio; Andrew R Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  To What Degree Do Pain-coping Strategies Affect Joint Stiffness and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Hand Fractures?

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Jung Ho Noh; Joo Han Oh; Hyun Sik Gong; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Toe-to-hand transfer: evolving indications and relevant outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer F Waljee; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Correlation of HISS and Strickland Score with the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in hand injuries.

Authors:  Anil K Bhat; A M Acharya; Deepankar Mishra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-17

5.  Predicting non return to work after orthopaedic trauma: the Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) model.

Authors:  François Luthi; Olivier Deriaz; Philippe Vuistiner; Cyrille Burrus; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Disability and health after replantation or revascularisation in the upper extremity in a population in southern Sweden - a retrospective long time follow up.

Authors:  Hans-Eric Rosberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Elective amputation and bionic substitution restore functional hand use after critical soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  Oskar C Aszmann; Ivan Vujaklija; Aidan D Roche; Stefan Salminger; Malvina Herceg; Agnes Sturma; Laura A Hruby; Anna Pittermann; Christian Hofer; Sebastian Amsuess; Dario Farina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Quality of life and reconstructive surgery efforts in severe hand injuries.

Authors:  Seyed Arash Alawi; Dennis Werner; Sören Könneker; Peter M Vogt; Andreas Jokuszies
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-04-20

9.  Rehabilitation cost share and cost analysis of traumatic hand injuries: Our single-center results.

Authors:  Merih Özgen; Ayşe Merve Aydoğan; Ali Uygur; Onur Armağan; Funda Berkan; Fezan Mutlu
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 10.  What are the Predictors of Return to Work for People With Elbow, Wrist, and Hand Conditions? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kayla Bousfield; Ju-Young Cheon; Sarah Harley; Amber Lampiris-Tremba; Justin Loseby; Nancy Bianchi; Andrew Barnes; Reuben Escorpizo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.