Literature DB >> 19410638

Analyzing gene expression from relative codon usage bias in Yeast genome: a statistical significance and biological relevance.

Shibsankar Das1, Uttam Roymondal, Satyabrata Sahoo.   

Abstract

Based on the hypothesis that highly expressed genes are often characterized by strong compositional bias in terms of codon usage, there are a number of measures currently in use that quantify codon usage bias in genes, and hence provide numerical indices to predict the expression levels of genes. With the recent advent of expression measure from the score of the relative codon usage bias (RCBS), we have explicitly tested the performance of this numerical measure to predict the gene expression level and illustrate this with an analysis of Yeast genomes. In contradiction with previous other studies, we observe a weak correlations between GC content and RCBS, but a selective pressure on the codon preferences in highly expressed genes. The assertion that the expression of a given gene depends on the score of relative codon usage bias (RCBS) is supported by the data. We further observe a strong correlation between RCBS and protein length indicating natural selection in favour of shorter genes to be expressed at higher level. We also attempt a statistical analysis to assess the strength of relative codon bias in genes as a guide to their likely expression level, suggesting a decrease of the informational entropy in the highly expressed genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19410638     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  11 in total

1.  Construction of the yeast whole-cell Rhizopus oryzae lipase biocatalyst with high activity.

Authors:  Mei-ling Chen; Qin Guo; Rui-zhi Wang; Juan Xu; Chen-wei Zhou; Hui Ruan; Guo-qing He
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Interspecific and intragenic differences in codon usage bias among vertebrate myosin heavy-chain genes.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Bryan C Rourke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Relative codon adaptation: a generic codon bias index for prediction of gene expression.

Authors:  Jesse M Fox; Ivan Erill
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Expression breadth and expression abundance behave differently in correlations with evolutionary rates.

Authors:  Seung Gu Park; Sun Shim Choi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Genes optimized by evolution for accurate and fast translation encode in Archaea and Bacteria a broad and characteristic spectrum of protein functions.

Authors:  Conrad von Mandach; Rainer Merkl
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Comparative Analysis of Predicted Gene Expression among Crenarchaeal Genomes.

Authors:  Shibsankar Das; Brajadulal Chottopadhyay; Satyabrata Sahoo
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2017-03-29

7.  Enhanced Secretory Expression and Surface Display Level of Bombyx mori Acetylcholinesterase 2 by Pichia pastoris Based on Codon Optimization Strategy for Pesticides Setection.

Authors:  Jiadong Li; Xi Xie; Jun Cai; Hong Wang; Jinyi Yang
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.926

8.  BioCode: two biologically compatible Algorithms for embedding data in non-coding and coding regions of DNA.

Authors:  David Haughton; Félix Balado
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Universal pattern and diverse strengths of successive synonymous codon bias in three domains of life, particularly among prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Yuan-Nong Ye; Hai-Long Zhao; Dan Lin; Wen Wei
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Comparative analysis of codon usage bias and codon context patterns between dipteran and hymenopteran sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Susanta K Behura; David W Severson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.