Literature DB >> 19408433

An observational study on the effectiveness of point-of-use chlorination.

Laura A McLaughlin1, Karen Levy, Nicola K Beck, Gwy-Am Shin, J Scott Meschke, Joseph N Eisenberg.   

Abstract

Although the efficacy of chlorine disinfection under controlled laboratory conditions is well known, the effectiveness of chlorine under field point-of-use (POU) conditions is still not clearly understood and may be impacted by a variety of factors. This study evaluated the effectiveness of POU chlorine disinfection in rural Ecuador under typical use conditions and compared this effectiveness with the efficacy in controlled laboratory conditions. While reductions of indicator organisms were slightly higher in households that used chlorination, no significant differences were seen between households employing POU chlorination and the households with no chlorination (1-1.5 log10 median reductions for chlorinating households and 0.31-0.55 log10 for nonchlorinating households, depending on the indicator organism). In contrast, significant reduction of all test organisms was found when simulating POU conditions in the laboratory. This study demonstrates that POU chlorination can be considerably less effective under actual field conditions than would be predicted based on its laboratory efficacy (3-5 log10 median reductions for chlorinated and 0-0.3 log10 for nonchlorinated samples). Human factors (including improper storage and chlorine dosing) and uncontrolled water quality effects are hypothesized to impact significantly the effectiveness of chlorine disinfection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19408433      PMCID: PMC2881824     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  12 in total

1.  Changes in the biochemical oxygen demand procedure in the 21st edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.

Authors:  James C Young; Lenore S Clesceri; Sabry M Kamhawy
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.946

2.  Bactericidal effect of chlorine on Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in drinking water.

Authors:  L B Whan; I R Grant; H J Ball; R Scott; M T Rowe
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  A low-cost intervention for cleaner drinking water in Karachi, Pakistan.

Authors:  S Luby; M Agboatwalla; A Raza; J Sobel; E Mintz; K Baier; M Rahbar; S Qureshi; R Hassan; F Ghouri; R M Hoekstra; E Gangarosa
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  A novel technology to improve drinking water quality: a microbiological evaluation of in-home flocculation and chlorination in rural Guatemala.

Authors:  Josefa M Rangel; Beatriz Lopez; Maricruz Alvarez Mejia; Carlos Mendoza; Stephen Luby
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.744

5.  Diarrhea prevention through household-level water disinfection and safe storage in Zambia.

Authors:  Robert E Quick; Akiko Kimura; Angelica Thevos; Mathias Tembo; Isidore Shamputa; Lori Hutwagner; Eric Mintz
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  [Water pollution and its impact in the Basic Health Area of Cistierna].

Authors:  J Fernández Gómez; A al-Kassam Mukdise; L Pérez Martínez; M L Santos Díez; P Aguado Carmona; I Díez González
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  1993-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  Effect of point-of-use disinfection, flocculation and combined flocculation-disinfection on drinking water quality in western Kenya.

Authors:  J A Crump; G O Okoth; L Slutsker; D O Ogaja; B H Keswick; S P Luby
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni by chlorine and monochloramine.

Authors:  M J Blaser; P F Smith; W L Wang; J C Hoff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A randomized controlled trial of household-based flocculant-disinfectant drinking water treatment for diarrhea prevention in rural Guatemala.

Authors:  Megan E Reller; Carlos E Mendoza; M Beatriz Lopez; Maricruz Alvarez; Robert M Hoekstra; Christy A Olson; Kathleen G Baier; Bruce H Keswick; Stephen P Luby
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.345

10.  Survival of Vibrio cholerae in African domestic water storage containers.

Authors:  M Patel; M Isaäcson
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1989-10-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Microbiological effectiveness of disinfecting water by boiling in rural Guatemala.

Authors:  Ghislaine Rosa; Laura Miller; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Estimating the scope of household water treatment in low- and medium-income countries.

Authors:  Ghislaine Rosa; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Household effectiveness vs. laboratory efficacy of point-of-use chlorination.

Authors:  Karen Levy; Larissa Anderson; Katharine A Robb; William Cevallos; Gabriel Trueba; Joseph N S Eisenberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Global access to safe water: accounting for water quality and the resulting impact on MDG progress.

Authors:  Kyle Onda; Joe LoBuglio; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Household and Individual Risk Factors for Cholera among Cholera Vaccine Recipients in Rural Haiti.

Authors:  Wilfredo R Matias; Jessica E Teng; Isabelle J Hilaire; Jason B Harris; Molly F Franke; Louise C Ivers
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.345

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.