Literature DB >> 19408250

Effect of deviation of nuchal translucency measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21.

K O Kagan1, D Wright, A Etchegaray, Y Zhou, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of deviations in median nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and the spread in measurements on the performance of screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal NT, and by maternal age, fetal NT and maternal serum biochemistry.
METHODS: We simulated the NT and multiples of the median values for pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) for 500 000 euploid and 500 000 trisomy 21 pregnancies at 12 weeks of gestation. Detection rates for trisomy 21 and false-positive rates were calculated without adjustments in NT and by adding or subtracting values ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 mm to each observed measurement. In addition, the effects of variation in the scatter of NT measurements were examined by applying a multiplicative factor ranging from 0.5 to 2 to the SD.
RESULTS: The detection rate of trisomy 21 for a fixed false-positive rate of 3% in screening by maternal age and fetal NT was 72%, and in screening by maternal age, fetal NT and serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A it was 86%. A consistent underestimate or overestimate in the measured NT reduced the detection rate of trisomy 21 for a fixed-false positive rate. At a fixed screen-positive cut-off an underestimate in fetal NT reduced the detection rate whereas an overestimate in NT increased the false-positive rate. A widening in the scatter of measurements had only a small impact on the detection rate but it caused a major increase in the false-positive rate.
CONCLUSIONS: High performance of screening necessitates appropriate measurement of fetal NT. This paper demonstrates the effect of deviations in the median and SD of NT from the expected on the performance of screening and can form the basis of audit of results of individual sonographers. (c) 2009 ISUOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19408250     DOI: 10.1002/uog.6370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  4 in total

1.  Effects of period of gestation and position of fetal neck on nuchal translucency measurement.

Authors:  Shailesh Kore; Aparna Hegde; Divya Kanavia; Pradnya Supe; Mansi Parikh; Y S Nandanwar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-04-16

2.  Analysis of quality of nuchal translucency measurements: its role in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Carmen Comas Gabriel; M Echevarria; I Rodríguez; B Serra
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2011-12-12

Review 3.  Non-invasive prenatal screening: A 20-year experience in Italy.

Authors:  Chiara Palka; Paolo Guanciali-Franchi; Elisena Morizio; Melissa Alfonsi; Marco Papponetti; Giulia Sabbatinelli; Giandomenico Palka; Giuseppe Calabrese; Peter Benn
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 4.  Antenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Karl Oliver Kagan; Jiri Sonek; Peter Kozlowski
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.