Literature DB >> 19408184

A real-life, ecologically valid test of executive functioning: the executive secretarial task.

Kirsten F Lamberts1, Jonathan J Evans, Jacoba M Spikman.   

Abstract

A major goal of neuropsychological assessment is predicting a person's level of functioning in daily life. Making predictions about everyday executive functioning based on tests is problematic because of the contrast between demands made in the test environment and demands made in everyday life (Shallice & Burgess, 1991). As executive functions play an important role in independent functioning, tests with robust psychometric properties and ecologically validity are needed. We developed the Executive Secretarial Task (EST) and assessed 92 participants: 35 brain-injured patients and 57 controls. Analyses showed the EST is sensitive to executive problems and has concurrent and ecological validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19408184     DOI: 10.1080/13803390902806550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  8 in total

1.  Naturalistic assessment of executive function and everyday multitasking in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Courtney McAlister; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-04-04

2.  Associations Between Task Performance and Self-Report Measures of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Distinct Abilities.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Naomi P Friedman; Benjamin L Hankin
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-10-21

3.  Measuring executive function in control subjects and TBI patients with question completion time (QCT).

Authors:  David L Woods; E William Yund; John M Wyma; Ron Ruff; Timothy J Herron
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Assessing complex executive functions with computerized tests: is that toast burning?

Authors:  Brian E McGuire
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 5.  Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences.

Authors:  Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  EXPANSE: A novel narrative serious game for the behavioral assessment of cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli; Carla de Juan Ripoll; Elena Parra; Mariano Alcañiz Raya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cooking breakfast after a brain injury.

Authors:  Annick N Tanguay; Patrick S R Davidson; Karla V Guerrero Nuñez; Mark B Ferland
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Daily Performance of Adolescents with Executive Function Deficits: An Empirical Study Using a Complex-Cooking Task.

Authors:  Yael Fogel; Sara Rosenblum; Renana Hirsh; Mathilde Chevignard; Naomi Josman
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.448

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.