Literature DB >> 19407624

An algorithmic approach to the use of gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy as a bridge to closure in pediatric extremity trauma.

Mark E Chariker1, Theodore L Gerstle, Clinton S Morrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy as a bridge to definitive closure of traumatic extremity wounds has been demonstrated in adults. Gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy has been used to facilitate granulation tissue formation and promote closure in a number of wound types. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy using the Chariker-Jeter technique for pediatric extremity wounds requiring delayed closure.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 24 pediatric patients presenting with extremity injuries involving soft-tissue defects not amenable to immediate primary closure. After initial irrigation, débridement, and antibiotic therapy, negative-pressure wound therapy using the Chariker-Jeter technique was applied and dressings were changed at 48- to 72-hour intervals before secondary closure or primary closure by skin graft, local flaps, or free tissue transfer.
RESULTS: Granulation tissue was noted in all wounds by day 4. The duration of vacuum therapy averaged 10 days in patients whose wounds were closed primarily (n = 19) and 17 days in patients who were allowed to heal by secondary intention (n = 5). Nine patients' wounds were closed with skin grafts and local flaps, eight were closed with local flaps only, and three were closed with free tissue transfer. There was no incidence of skin graft loss or flap failure. Follow-up evaluation of the wounds averaged 24 months, during which no complications were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: As a relatively atraumatic wound care technique with few complications, gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy with the Chariker-Jeter technique provides a highly effective option for temporary soft-tissue management of extremity trauma in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19407624     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a20563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in challenging wounds.

Authors:  Umut Tuncel; Ünal Erkorkmaz; Aydın Turan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Clinical evaluation of improvised gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in military wounds.

Authors:  Junaid Mansoor; Irfan Ellahi; Zartash Junaid; Adeel Habib; Uzair Ilyas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Management of Traumatic Wounds and a Novel Approach to Delivering Wound Care in Children.

Authors:  Kathryn Q Bernabe; Thomas J Desmarais; Martin S Keller
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Debridement Techniques in Pediatric Trauma and Burn-Related Wounds.

Authors:  Lisa Block; Timothy W King; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Simplified Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device for Application in Low-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Danielle R Zurovcik; Gita N Mody; Robert Riviello; Alex Slocum
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Infants and Children: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Matt Keller; Margaret A Olsen; Alexandra M Keane; Erika D Sears; Alison K Snyder-Warwick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  The role of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Raphael Parrado; Manuel Cadena; Arturo Vergara; Diana Cadena; Juan G Chalela
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Assessment of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in the split-thickness skin graft clinical pathway-an observational study.

Authors:  Raymond M Dunn; Ron Ignotz; Trevor Mole; John Cockwill; Jennifer M Smith
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-03-16

9.  Use of bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh in negative pressure wound therapy provides significant granulation tissue without tissue ingrowth.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-01-17

10.  Cost-effective Alternative for Negative-pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Jeff J Kim; Mieczyslawa Franczyk; Lawrence J Gottlieb; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.