Literature DB >> 19407567

Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Woong Ju1, Seung-Kwon Myung, Yeol Kim, Hyuck Jae Choi, Seung Cheol Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma compared with laparotomy.
METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Review databases in September 2007. Three independent evaluators selected the articles according to predetermined selection criteria.
RESULTS: Thirteen comparative studies (5 prospective and 8 retrospective) that met the selection criteria were included. In a fixed-effects meta-analysis, the overall survival and therecurrence rate showed no significant differences between the laparoscopy and the laparotomy groups, with odds ratios of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.62) and 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.16), respectively. However, the complication rate was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group with an odds ratio of 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: The survival outcome and recurrence rate after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma were similar to those in the laparotomy procedures. However, the complication rate was lower after laparoscopy compared with laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19407567     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1caf8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery is a current tide of widely accepted standard procedure for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kong; Kyung Mi Lee; Ji Yoon Cheong; Woo Young Kim; Suk-Joon Chang; Seung-Chul Yoo; Jong-Hyuck Yoon; Ki-Hong Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Use of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer - Results of a 2012 Germany-wide Survey.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; P Mallmann; C P Möller; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Surgical management of early endometrial cancer: an update and proposal of a therapeutic algorithm.

Authors:  Francesca Falcone; Giancarlo Balbi; Luca Di Martino; Flavio Grauso; Maria Elena Salzillo; Enrico Michelino Messalli
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-07-26

6.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Hannah Donkers; Andrew Bryant; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-31

7.  Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in the Treatment of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Huiqiao Gao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.