PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management program comparing treatment participants to a randomized usual-care control group at 6 months. METHODS: A total of 345 adults with type 2 diabetes but no criteria for high A1C were randomized to a usual-care control group or 6-week community-based, peer-led diabetes self-management program (DSMP). Randomized participants were compared at 6 months. The DSMP intervention participants were followed for an additional 6 months (12 months total). A1C and body mass index were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All other data were collected by self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: At 6 months, DSMP participants did not demonstrate improvements in A1C as compared with controls. Baseline A1C was much lower than in similar trials. Participants did have significant improvements in depression, symptoms of hypoglycemia, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food labels (P < .01). They also had significant improvements in patient activation and self-efficacy. At 12 months, DSMP intervention participants continued to demonstrate improvements in depression, communication with physicians, healthy eating, patient activation, and self-efficacy (P < .01). There were no significant changes in utilization measures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that people with diabetes without elevated A1C can benefit from a community-based, peer-led diabetes program. Given the large number of people with diabetes and lack of low-cost diabetes education, the DSMP deserves consideration for implementation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management program comparing treatment participants to a randomized usual-care control group at 6 months. METHODS: A total of 345 adults with type 2 diabetes but no criteria for high A1C were randomized to a usual-care control group or 6-week community-based, peer-led diabetes self-management program (DSMP). Randomized participants were compared at 6 months. The DSMP intervention participants were followed for an additional 6 months (12 months total). A1C and body mass index were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All other data were collected by self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: At 6 months, DSMPparticipants did not demonstrate improvements in A1C as compared with controls. Baseline A1C was much lower than in similar trials. Participants did have significant improvements in depression, symptoms of hypoglycemia, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food labels (P < .01). They also had significant improvements in patient activation and self-efficacy. At 12 months, DSMP intervention participants continued to demonstrate improvements in depression, communication with physicians, healthy eating, patient activation, and self-efficacy (P < .01). There were no significant changes in utilization measures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that people with diabetes without elevated A1C can benefit from a community-based, peer-led diabetes program. Given the large number of people with diabetes and lack of low-cost diabetes education, the DSMP deserves consideration for implementation.
Authors: Heather J Cole-Lewis; Arlene M Smaldone; Patricia R Davidson; Rita Kukafka; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Elizabeth D Mynatt; George Hripcsak; Lena Mamykina Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Allison C Sylvetsky; Radha Nandagopal; Tammy T Nguyen; Marisa R Abegg; Mahathi Nagarur; Paul Kaplowitz; Kristina I Rother Journal: World J Diabetes Date: 2015-12-25
Authors: Sally E Findley; Sergio Matos; April L Hicks; Ayanna Campbell; Addison Moore; Diurka Diaz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michele Heisler; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Mark E Cowen; Matthew D Davis; Ken Resnicow; Robert L Strawderman; Hwajung Choi; Rebecca Mase; John D Piette Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Leopoldo J Cabassa; Angela Parcesepe; Andel Nicasio; Ellen Baxter; Sam Tsemberis; Roberto Lewis-Fernández Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2012-12-20