L D Howe1, J R Hargreaves, S Gabrysch, S R A Huttly. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. laura.howe@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies require a measure of socioeconomic position. The monetary measure preferred by economists is consumption expenditure; the wealth index has been proposed as a reliable, simple alternative to expenditure and is extensively used. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of the agreement between wealth indices and consumption expenditure, summarising the agreement and exploring factors affecting agreement. RESULTS: Seventeen studies using 36 datasets met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 demonstrated weak agreement, 10 moderate agreement, and four strong agreement. There was some evidence that agreement is higher: in middle-income settings; in urban areas; for wealth indices with a greater number of indicators; and for wealth indices including a wider range of indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The wealth index is mostly a poor proxy for consumption expenditure.
BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies require a measure of socioeconomic position. The monetary measure preferred by economists is consumption expenditure; the wealth index has been proposed as a reliable, simple alternative to expenditure and is extensively used. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of the agreement between wealth indices and consumption expenditure, summarising the agreement and exploring factors affecting agreement. RESULTS: Seventeen studies using 36 datasets met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 demonstrated weak agreement, 10 moderate agreement, and four strong agreement. There was some evidence that agreement is higher: in middle-income settings; in urban areas; for wealth indices with a greater number of indicators; and for wealth indices including a wider range of indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The wealth index is mostly a poor proxy for consumption expenditure.
Authors: Md Mobarak Hossain Khan; Alexander Krämer; Aklimunnessa Khandoker; Luise Prüfer-Krämer; Anwar Islam Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Thomas Fürst; Andres B Tschannen; Giovanna Raso; Cinthia A Acka; Don de Savigny; Olivier Girardin; Eliézer K N'Goran; Jürg Utzinger Journal: Emerg Themes Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-31
Authors: Rita Barradas Barata; Manoel Carlos Sampaio de Almeida Ribeiro; José Cássio de Moraes; Brendan Flannery Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Lucy S Tusting; John C Rek; Emmanuel Arinaitwe; Sarah G Staedke; Moses R Kamya; Christian Bottomley; Deborah Johnston; Jo Lines; Grant Dorsey; Steve W Lindsay Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.345