Literature DB >> 19406725

Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide for newly diagnosed myeloma: kinetics of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and time-to-event results.

Antonio Palumbo1, Patrizia Falco, Antonietta Falcone, Giulia Benevolo, Letizia Canepa, Francesca Gay, Alessandra Larocca, Valeria Magarotto, Alessandro Gozzetti, Annalisa Luraschi, Fortunato Morabito, Andrea Nozza, Robert D Knight, Jerome B Zeldis, Mario Boccadoro, Maria Teresa Petrucci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial analysis of the combination melphalan, prednisone, plus lenalidomide (MPR) showed significant antimyeloma activity in patients with untreated multiple myeloma, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as the most frequent side effects. This updated analysis reassessed the kinetics of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as well as the safety and efficacy of MPR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma received melphalan 0.18 mg/kg on days 1-4, prednisone 2 mg/kg on days 1-4, and lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-21 for nine 28-day cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-21.
RESULTS: Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 52% of the patients, and granulocyte colonystimulating factor was administered in 43%. The mean neutrophil counts at the start of each MPR cycle, during nadir, and after 6 months of maintenance were 2.69 x 109/L, 1.43 x 109/L, and 2.11 x 109/L, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 24% of the patients. Platelet transfusions were required by 1 patient (5%) with a platelet count of 16 x 109/L; however, no thrombocytopenia-associated bleeding was reported. The mean platelet counts at the start of each cycle, during nadir, and after 6 months of maintenance were 174 x 109/L, 121 x 109/L, and 158 x 109/L, respectively. Median follow-up was 29.6 months, median progression-free survival was 28.5 months, and 2-year overall survival was 91%.
CONCLUSION: MPR is a promising regimen with manageable hematologic toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19406725     DOI: 10.3816/CLM.2009.n.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma        ISSN: 1557-9190


  5 in total

Review 1.  Improving induction therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ajay Nooka; Charise Gleason; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review of its role in therapy.

Authors:  Paul Richardson; Constantine Mitsiades; Jacob Laubach; Robert Schlossman; Irene Ghobrial; Teru Hideshima; Nikhil Munshi; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

3.  HDAC inhibitor AR-42 decreases CD44 expression and sensitizes myeloma cells to lenalidomide.

Authors:  Alessandro Canella; Hector Cordero Nieves; Douglas W Sborov; Luciano Cascione; Hanna S Radomska; Emily Smith; Andrew Stiff; Jessica Consiglio; Enrico Caserta; Lara Rizzotto; Nicola Zanesi; Volinia Stefano; Balveen Kaur; Xiaokui Mo; John C Byrd; Yvonne A Efebera; Craig C Hofmeister; Flavia Pichiorri
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13

4.  Practical approaches to the use of lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: a canadian consensus.

Authors:  Donna Reece; C Tom Kouroukis; Richard Leblanc; Michael Sebag; Kevin Song; John Ashkenas
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2012-10-14

Review 5.  Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Meral Beksac; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Jamie Cavenagh; Michele Cavo; Meletios Dimopoulos; Johannes Drach; Hermann Einsele; Thierry Facon; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Urs Hess; Nicolas Ketterer; Martin Kropff; Larisa Mendeleeva; Gareth Morgan; Antonio Palumbo; Torben Plesner; Jesús San Miguel; Ofer Shpilberg; Pia Sondergeld; Pieter Sonneveld; Sonja Zweegman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-01-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.