Literature DB >> 19404886

Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.

Kristin Hendrickx1, Benedicte De Winter, Wiebren Tjalma, Drik Avonts, Griet Peeraer, Jean-Jacques Wyndaele.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For fifth-year's undergraduates of the medical school, a project with simulated patients (Intimate Examination Associates, IEA) was implemented in 2002 at the University of Antwerp. In this project, students from the new curriculum (NC) learned uro-genital, rectal, gynaecological and breast examination in healthy, trained volunteers and received feedback focused on personal attitude, technical and communication skills. Former curriculum (FC) students however trained these skills only during internship in the sixth year after a single training on manikins. AIMS: This study assessed the effect of learning intimate examinations with IEA's by comparing students from FC and NC on four different outcome parameters.
METHODS: Three groups were compared: FC after internships without IEA training, NC after internships with IEA training and fifth year NC immediately after the IEA training. Four assessment instruments: an OSCE using checklists and global rating scales to assess the technical skills, a score list on students attitudes and performance filled in by the IEA's, a student questionnaire on self-assessed competence and a questionnaire on the frequency of performing intimate skills during internships.
RESULTS: Both NC groups scored globally better in the OSCE (significance for male examination). Sub-scores for 'completeness' and 'systematic' approach was significantly higher in both NC groups for male and female examinations. NC students reported better self-assessed competence and performance concerning gynaecological and urological clinical and communication skills during internship. The best results were obtained after IEA training and internship was done for the four outcomes. IEA's are influenced by the 'experienced' students after internship: FC and NC after internship both scored better than the fifth year NC who only received the IEA training so far.
CONCLUSION: Learning intimate examinations with IEA's has a positive effect on the performance of medical students. This beneficial effect is on its turn reinforced during internships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404886     DOI: 10.1080/01421590802516715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  8 in total

Review 1.  Novel Approaches To Undergraduate Oncology Education.

Authors:  Francis J Ha; Sagun Parakh
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation in teaching digital rectal examination: a systematic review narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Mansour A Al Asmri; James Ennis; Robert John Stone; Fernando Bello; M Sayeed Haque; Jim Parle
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-08-01

3.  Genital examination training: assessing the effectiveness of an integrated female and male teaching programme.

Authors:  Lynn McBain; Susan Pullon; Sue Garrett; Kath Hoare
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Blurred boundaries: sexuality and power in standardised patients' negotiations of the physical examination.

Authors:  Grainne P Kearney; Gerard J Gormley; Diane Wilson; Jennifer L Johnston
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-26

5.  One-on-one mentoring for final year medical students during the neurosurgery rotation.

Authors:  Felix Behling; Isabella Nasi-Kordhishti; Patrick Haas; Joey Sandritter; Marcos Tatagiba; Stephan Herlan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Conscious engagement within patients' and simulated participants' personal space: medical students' perspective.

Authors:  Chara Banks-McGovern; Gerard J Gormley; Diane Wilson; Grainne P Kearney
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-05

7.  Psychometric characterization of the obstetric communication assessment tool for medical education: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Noel Rodriguez; Peter DeWitt; Jennifer Fisher; Kirsten Broadfoot; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-06-11

8.  Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overview.

Authors:  Susanne Gerhard-Szep; Arndt Güntsch; Peter Pospiech; Andreas Söhnel; Petra Scheutzel; Torsten Wassmann; Tugba Zahn
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.