Literature DB >> 19404630

Effect of reduced cutaneous cues on motion perception and postural control.

Yongwoo Yi1, Sukyung Park.   

Abstract

To investigate whether the sensory perception could be a more direct assessment of sensory deficit as oppose to the postural performance, we examined the effect of reduced cutaneous cues on motion perception and motion control. The subject was translated in a mediolateral direction with a single sinusoidal acceleration at a stimulus frequency of 0.25 Hz with a peak acceleration magnitude ranging from 0.25 to 8 mG in the dark. Two different plantar cutaneous conditions were provided: the control condition (barefoot) and the reduced cutaneous condition (foot on a spongy surface). For each foot-sole sensory condition, the subject completed six sets of 33 randomly ordered translation stimuli. After each translational stimulus, the subject reported their perceived direction of motion by pressing a hand-held button. The center of pressure (COP) and joint kinematics of the quiet stance were also measured. The results showed a significant increase in perception threshold as well as COP variation in the anteroposterior direction in the reduced cutaneous cue trials. However, a non-significant increase in COP in the mediolateral direction was shown. Multivariate covariance analysis of joint kinematics showed changes in postural coordination, such as increased reliance on hip strategy under reduced cutaneous cues condition, that have not been differentiated by univariate measures. The observed discrepancy in the significance of the contribution of plantar cutaneous cues to the detection threshold and the COP variation implies that the 'perception' could provide more direct and sensitive assessment of the sensory degradation than the 'action'.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404630     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1796-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Contribution of ankle, knee, and hip joints to the perception threshold for support surface rotation.

Authors:  N Teasdale; V Nougier; P A Barraud; C Bourdin; B Debû; D Poquin; C Raphel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Force-plate based computation of ankle and hip strategies from double-inverted pendulum model.

Authors:  Briac Colobert; Armel Crétual; Paul Allard; Paul Delamarche
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity.

Authors:  F B Horak; F Hlavacka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Gait abnormalities in diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  E C Katoulis; M Ebdon-Parry; H Lanshammar; L Vileikyte; J Kulkarni; A J Boulton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Decompression of peripheral nerves for diabetic neuropathy in the lower extremity.

Authors:  William A Wood; Michael A Wood
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.286

7.  Older women with diabetes have a higher risk of falls: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ann V Schwartz; Teresa A Hillier; Deborah E Sellmeyer; Helaine E Resnick; Edward Gregg; Kristine E Ensrud; Pamela J Schreiner; Karen L Margolis; Jane A Cauley; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  The neuropathic joint.

Authors:  W Sequeira
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Postural instability in patients with diabetic sensory neuropathy.

Authors:  G G Simoneau; J S Ulbrecht; J A Derr; M B Becker; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diabetic neuropathy is related to joint stiffness during late stance phase.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Denis Brunt; Robert J Tanenberg
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.833

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Plantar Exteroceptive Efficiency Modulates Postural and Oculomotor Control: Inter-Individual Variability.

Authors:  Arnaud Foisy; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Footwear Decreases Gait Asymmetry during Running.

Authors:  Stefan Hoerzer; Peter A Federolf; Christian Maurer; Jennifer Baltich; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Plantar Exteroceptive Inefficiency causes an asynergic use of plantar and visual afferents for postural control: Best means of remediation.

Authors:  Arnaud Foisy; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Plantar cutaneous afferents influence the perception of Subjective Visual Vertical in quiet stance.

Authors:  A Foisy; Z Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.