AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The list of validated type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants has recently been expanded from three to 19. The variants identified are common and have low penetrance in the general population. The aim of the study is to investigate the combined effect of the 19 variants by applying receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to demonstrate the discriminatory value between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetes patients in a cross-sectional population of Danes. METHODS: The 19 variants were genotyped in three study populations: the population-based Inter99 study; the ADDITION study; and additional type 2 diabetic patients and glucose-tolerant individuals. The case-control studies involved 4,093 type 2 diabetic patients and 5,302 glucose-tolerant individuals. RESULTS: Single-variant analyses demonstrated allelic odds ratios ranging from 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11) to 1.33 (95% CI 1.22-1.45). When combining the 19 variants, subgroups with extreme risk profiles showed a threefold difference in the risk of type 2 diabetes (lower 10% carriers with < or =15 risk alleles vs upper 10% carriers with > or =22 risk alleles, OR 2.93 (95% CI 2.38-3.62, p = 1.6 x 10(-25)). We calculated the area under a ROC curve to estimate the discrimination rate between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetes patients based on the 19 variants. We found an area under the ROC curve of 0.60. Two-way gene-gene interaction showed few nominal interaction effects. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Combined analysis of the 19 validated variants enables detection of subgroups at substantially increased risk of type 2 diabetes; however, the discrimination between glucose-tolerant and type 2 diabetes individuals is still too inaccurate to achieve clinical value.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The list of validated type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants has recently been expanded from three to 19. The variants identified are common and have low penetrance in the general population. The aim of the study is to investigate the combined effect of the 19 variants by applying receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to demonstrate the discriminatory value between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetespatients in a cross-sectional population of Danes. METHODS: The 19 variants were genotyped in three study populations: the population-based Inter99 study; the ADDITION study; and additional type 2 diabeticpatients and glucose-tolerant individuals. The case-control studies involved 4,093 type 2 diabeticpatients and 5,302 glucose-tolerant individuals. RESULTS: Single-variant analyses demonstrated allelic odds ratios ranging from 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11) to 1.33 (95% CI 1.22-1.45). When combining the 19 variants, subgroups with extreme risk profiles showed a threefold difference in the risk of type 2 diabetes (lower 10% carriers with < or =15 risk alleles vs upper 10% carriers with > or =22 risk alleles, OR 2.93 (95% CI 2.38-3.62, p = 1.6 x 10(-25)). We calculated the area under a ROC curve to estimate the discrimination rate between glucose-tolerant individuals and type 2 diabetespatients based on the 19 variants. We found an area under the ROC curve of 0.60. Two-way gene-gene interaction showed few nominal interaction effects. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Combined analysis of the 19 validated variants enables detection of subgroups at substantially increased risk of type 2 diabetes; however, the discrimination between glucose-tolerant and type 2 diabetes individuals is still too inaccurate to achieve clinical value.
Authors: Struan F A Grant; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Inga Reynisdottir; Rafn Benediktsson; Andrei Manolescu; Jesus Sainz; Agnar Helgason; Hreinn Stefansson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Helgadottir; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Kristinn P Magnusson; G Bragi Walters; Ebba Palsdottir; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; Thorunn Gudmundsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Jona Saemundsdottir; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Daniel J Rader; Yu Bagger; Claus Christiansen; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jose C Florez; Kathleen A Jablonski; Nick Bayley; Toni I Pollin; Paul I W de Bakker; Alan R Shuldiner; William C Knowler; David M Nathan; David Altshuler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richa Saxena; Benjamin F Voight; Valeriya Lyssenko; Noël P Burtt; Paul I W de Bakker; Hong Chen; Jeffrey J Roix; Sekar Kathiresan; Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly; Thomas E Hughes; Leif Groop; David Altshuler; Peter Almgren; Jose C Florez; Joanne Meyer; Kristin Ardlie; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Bo Isomaa; Guillaume Lettre; Ulf Lindblad; Helen N Lyon; Olle Melander; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Nilsson; Marju Orho-Melander; Lennart Råstam; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Candace Guiducci; Anna Berglund; Joyce Carlson; Lauren Gianniny; Rachel Hackett; Liselotte Hall; Johan Holmkvist; Esa Laurila; Marketa Sjögren; Maria Sterner; Aarti Surti; Margareta Svensson; Malin Svensson; Ryan Tewhey; Brendan Blumenstiel; Melissa Parkin; Matthew Defelice; Rachel Barry; Wendy Brodeur; Jody Camarata; Nancy Chia; Mary Fava; John Gibbons; Bob Handsaker; Claire Healy; Kieu Nguyen; Casey Gates; Carrie Sougnez; Diane Gage; Marcia Nizzari; Stacey B Gabriel; Gung-Wei Chirn; Qicheng Ma; Hemang Parikh; Delwood Richardson; Darrell Ricke; Shaun Purcell Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Valeriya Lyssenko; Cecilia L F Nagorny; Michael R Erdos; Nils Wierup; Anna Jonsson; Peter Spégel; Marco Bugliani; Richa Saxena; Malin Fex; Nicolo Pulizzi; Bo Isomaa; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Peter Nilsson; Johanna Kuusisto; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Michael Boehnke; David Altshuler; Frank Sundler; Johan G Eriksson; Anne U Jackson; Markku Laakso; Piero Marchetti; Richard M Watanabe; Hindrik Mulder; Leif Groop Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-12-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Christian Dina; David Meyre; Sophie Gallina; Emmanuelle Durand; Antje Körner; Peter Jacobson; Lena M S Carlsson; Wieland Kiess; Vincent Vatin; Cecile Lecoeur; Jérome Delplanque; Emmanuel Vaillant; François Pattou; Juan Ruiz; Jacques Weill; Claire Levy-Marchal; Fritz Horber; Natascha Potoczna; Serge Hercberg; Catherine Le Stunff; Pierre Bougnères; Peter Kovacs; Michel Marre; Beverley Balkau; Stéphane Cauchi; Jean-Claude Chèvre; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-05-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Eleftheria Zeggini; Michael N Weedon; Cecilia M Lindgren; Timothy M Frayling; Katherine S Elliott; Hana Lango; Nicholas J Timpson; John R B Perry; Nigel W Rayner; Rachel M Freathy; Jeffrey C Barrett; Beverley Shields; Andrew P Morris; Sian Ellard; Christopher J Groves; Lorna W Harries; Jonathan L Marchini; Katharine R Owen; Beatrice Knight; Lon R Cardon; Mark Walker; Graham A Hitman; Andrew D Morris; Alex S F Doney; Mark I McCarthy; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Rosalind J Neuman; Jon Wasson; Gil Atzmon; Julio Wainstein; Yair Yerushalmi; Joseph Cohen; Nir Barzilai; Ilana Blech; Benjamin Glaser; M Alan Permutt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Philippa J Talmud; Aroon D Hingorani; Jackie A Cooper; Michael G Marmot; Eric J Brunner; Meena Kumari; Mika Kivimäki; Steve E Humphries Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-01-14