Literature DB >> 19404176

Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

Jia-Xin Xu1, Ying-Ze Zhang, Yong Shen, Wen-Yuan Ding.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing single- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN).
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the modified techniques of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan disc and analyze the clinical and radiologic effects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Aggravation of kyphosis is the known challenge after arthroplasty. Disc insertion angle and overmilling were reported to be factors causing kyphosis. However, few studies have performed methods to avoid these factors. Additionally, translation and length matching of prosthesis seemed to be ignored. There have been no studies regarding the effects of modified techniques for the prevention of these adverse outcomes.
METHODS: Modified techniques include change in disc insertion, reducing overmilling of endplates, the assurance of the anterior borders at the same horizontal line, and the accurate fitness of prosthesis size. Techniques described in product monograph were applied to 20 patients (control group) and modified techniques were applied to 19 patients (investigational group). Clinical and radiologic (radiograph) follow-ups of all the patients were performed before surgery and after surgery (6 months). Comparisons between the 2 groups in terms of functional spinal unit angle, shell angle, the anteroposterior displacement between the 2 metal shells in the neutral position, and the fitness of prosthesis size were performed.
RESULTS: Radiologic outcomes in investigational group were significantly superior to those in control group; clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The modified techniques can improve the outcomes of the cervical arthroplasty with Bryan disc and prevent the unexpected imbalance and motion of cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404176     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c4a5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  [The relevance of the sagittal profile in cervical artificial discs].

Authors:  C Carstens; M Carstens; F Copf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Changgui Shi; Yifei Gu; Chengwei Yang; Rui Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Heterotopic ossification is related to change in disc space angle after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lingyun Hu; Jianying Zhang; Hao Liu; Yang Meng; Yi Yang; Guangzhou Li; Chen Ding; Beiyu Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The Correlation between Insertion Depth of Prodisc-C Artificial Disc and Postoperative Kyphotic Deformity: Clinical Importance of Insertion Depth of Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Do-Youl Lee; Se-Hoon Kim; Jung-Keun Suh; Tai-Hyoung Cho; Yong-Gu Chung
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

6.  Clinical and Radiological Analysis of Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for "Skip" Multi-Segment Cervical Spondylosis: Long-Term Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Zikun Shang; Yingze Zhang; Di Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-04

7.  Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.

Authors:  Chuanhong Li; Xing Yu; Yang Xiong; Yongdong Yang; Fengxian Wang; He Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Bradley Moatz; P Justin Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17

Review 9.  Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aria Fallah; Elie A Akl; Shanil Ebrahim; George M Ibrahim; Alireza Mansouri; Clary J Foote; Yuqing Zhang; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.