Literature DB >> 19404155

Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Jay Jagannathan1, Charles A Sansur, Rod J Oskouian, Kai-Ming Fu, Christopher I Shaffrey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of lumbar lordosis is a critical factor in long-term success after lumbar fusions. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a popular surgical technique in the lumbar spine, but few data exist on change in spinal alignment after the procedure.
METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent TLIF surgery were retrospectively reviewed (minimum follow-up period, 2 years). Standing x-rays were assessed for changes in focal and segmental kyphosis, and restoration of lumbar lordosis. Improvement in spondylolisthesis, sagittal balance, and scoliosis were also assessed. Fusion was assessed as well.
RESULTS: Eighty operations were performed at 107 levels. Mean presenting lumbar Cobb angle measurement (L1-S1) was 36.3 +/- 4.5 degrees (range, 12-77 degrees). Forty patients (50%) had sagittal imbalance. Mean postoperative Cobb angle (L1-S1) was 55.1 +/- 6.6. Thirty-three of 36 patients with segmental kyphosis (92%) had restoration of lordosis. Improvement in alignment was most prominent at the surgical level (mean increase in lordosis, 20.2 +/- 4.2 degrees). The improvement in lumbar lordosis among patients undergoing multilevel TLIFs (27.3 +/- 3.4 degrees) was significantly higher compared with patients undergoing single-level operations (17.4 +/- 4.4) (Student's t test, P = 0.0004). Thirty of the 40 patients with sagittal imbalance (75%) achieved immediate restoration of normal sagittal balance. The ability to restore normal sagittal balance was correlated with a sagittal imbalance of less than 10 cm (P = 0.0001). Spondylolisthesis was completely corrected at the TLIF site in 90 of 99 levels (91%). Three patients (4%) required reoperation, 2 for implant disengagement and 1 for worsening kyphoscoliosis above the original surgical levels. Two of the 80 patients had pseudoarthrosis; hence, the rate of pseudoarthrosis was 2.5%.
CONCLUSION: The TLIF operation is highly effective in improving spinal alignment in patients with degenerative spinal disorders when the appropriate surgical technique is implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404155     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  24 in total

1.  Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

Authors:  Mourad Ould-Slimane; Thibaut Lenoir; Cyril Dauzac; Ludovic Rillardon; Etienne Hoffmann; Pierre Guigui; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correction of sagittal plane deformity and predictive factors for a favourable radiological outcome following multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion for mild degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Silviu Sabou; Tzu-Heng Jason Tseng; John Stephenson; Irfan Siddique; Rajat Verma; Saeed Mohammad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Deformity TLIF: Bilateral Facetectomy and Osteotomy Closure with a Hinged Table.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Kristen E Jones; David W Polly
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

4.  Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction.

Authors:  Priyan R Landham; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  M Quante; H Kesten; A Richter; H Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Sharon C Yson; Ryan D Horazdovsky; Edward Rainier G Santos; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

7.  Restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): comparison between straight type versus curvilinear type cage.

Authors:  Jong-Tae Kim; Myung-Hoon Shin; Ho-Jin Lee; Du-Yong Choi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Two-Year Study Evaluating Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Graham Mulvaney; Steve Monk; Jonathan D Clemente; Deborah Pfortmiller; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 9.  Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ravi Verma; Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-01-13

10.  The influence of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on patient discharge disposition following minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mohamed Macki; Hassan A Fadel; Travis Hamilton; Seokchun Lim; Lara W Massie; Hesham Mostafa Zakaria; Jacob Pawloski; Victor Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.