Literature DB >> 19404052

Lymph node harvest after proctectomy for invasive rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy: does the same standard apply?

Hao Wang1, Bashar Safar, Steven Wexner, Ronghua Zhao, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Mariana Berho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent reports indicate that neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the lymph node harvest of rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to interpret the lymph node harvest in this setting based on the primary tumor response.
METHODS: All patients undergoing proctectomy were included. Three variables were used as indicators of primary tumor response: ypT stage, tumor size, and tumor regression grade.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, 237 patients were identified: 157 in the neoadjuvant therapy group and 80 in the nonneoadjuvant therapy group. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduced the number of lymph nodes harvested (P = 0.011). Compared with the nonneoadjuvant group, there were significantly fewer lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant early T stage group (P = 0.001), small tumor size group (P = 0.003), and low tumor regression grade group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the nonneoadjuvant group and the neoadjuvant advanced T stage (P = 0.664), large tumor (P = 0.815), and high tumor regression grade groups (P = 0.566).
CONCLUSION: The current standard of lymph node harvest should be applied to patients with poorly responding primary tumors after neoadjuvant therapy. However, a new standard may be necessary to define the adequate number of lymph nodes for tumors that respond well to neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404052     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819eb872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of lymph node metastasis are different in colon and rectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Xian-Zhao Wei; Chuan-Gang Fu; Rong-Hua Zhao; Fu-Ao Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Implications of lymph node retrieval in locoregional rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: a California Cancer Registry Study.

Authors:  A Gill; A Brunson; P Lara; V Khatri; T J Semrad
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes is more important for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Seok-Byung Lim; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Tae Won Kim; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Lymph node count after preoperative radiotherapy is an independently prognostic factor for pathologically lymph node-negative patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Qingguo Li; Changhua Zhuo; Lei Liang; Hongtu Zheng; Dawei Li; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Can Ex Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rectal Cancer Specimens Improve the Mesorectal Lymph Node Yield for Pathological Examination?

Authors:  Rutger Stijns; Bart Philips; Carla Wauters; Johannes de Wilt; Iris Nagtegaal; Tom Scheenen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Zhi-Gui Zuo; Xiu-Feng Zhang; Hao Wang; Qi-Zhi Liu; Xing-Zhao Ye; Chang Xu; Xiang-Bin Wu; Jian-Hui Cai; Zhen-Hua Zhou; Jin-Lei Li; Hua-Yu Song; Zu-Qiang Luo; Peng Li; Shi-Chang Ni; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Lymph nodes' evaluation in relation to colorectal cancer staging among African Americans.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Temitayo Ogundipe; Hassan Brim; Anahita Shahnazi; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Edward Lee; Babak Shokrani; Mehdi Nouraie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Effect of high ligation on survival of patients undergoing surgery for primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  S Matsui; K Okabayashi; H Hasegawa; M Tsuruta; K Shigeta; T Ishida; T Yamada; T Kondo; S Yamauchi; K Sugihara; Y Kitagawa
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-04-03

9.  Fat clearance and conventional fixation identified ypN0 rectal cancers following intermediate neoadjuvant radiotherapy have similar long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Nan Chen; Ting-Ting Sun; Zhong-Wu Li; Yun-Feng Yao; Lin Wang; Ai-Wen Wu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15

10.  Influence of tumor location on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Yang; Zhendan Yao; Ming Cui; Jiadi Xing; Chenghai Zhang; Nan Zhang; Maoxing Liu; Kai Xu; Fei Tan; Xiangqian Su
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.