Literature DB >> 19403885

American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care.

Elizabeth Goss1, Ana Maria Lopez, Carol L Brown, Dana S Wollins, Otis W Brawley, Derek Raghavan.   

Abstract

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has embarked on an intensive campaign to integrate elimination of cancer health disparities into the Society's overall mission and activities. Key components of this commitment are enhancing awareness of disparities; improving access to care; and supporting research on health disparities. Major objectives are to advance the education of the oncology community in the care of patients from underserved and minority populations; increase the diversity of the clinical oncology workforce as a requisite to improving access to cancer care for the underserved; and support research in the area of health disparities. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care are an issue of critical importance to ASCO, the oncology community, and our society at large. The health disparities initiative outlined herein enunciates ASCO's dedication to eliminating disparities in cancer care and discusses our multipronged approach for addressing disparities within the clinical oncology community. ASCO is committed to collaborating with the diverse community of stakeholders to undertake the following: develop policies to guarantee equal access to quality health care, with special emphasis on reducing insurance and economic barriers to cancer care; develop a comprehensive plan to increase awareness of racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care; execute a strategy to enhance the supply of minority physicians and to improve the training of the oncology workforce to meet the needs of racially and ethnically diverse cancer patients; increase prioritization of public and private research on cancer care disparities; develop mechanisms to increase participation of racially and ethnically diverse populations in cancer clinical trials; and support initiatives to enhance patients' involvement in their cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403885     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

1.  The truth, the whole truth, and the medical record.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Yvonne Collins; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Dineo Khabele; John H Farley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Culturally and linguistically diverse patient participation in glioma research.

Authors:  Zarnie Lwin; Alexander Broom; Rasha Cosman; Ann Livingstone; Kate Sawkins; Phillip Good; Emma Kirby; Eng-Siew Koh; Elizabeth Hovey
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2014-06-25

4.  Implementing cancer prevention into clinical practice.

Authors:  Lynn Cialdella-Kam; Parichart Sabado; M Katherine Bispeck; Sol Silverman; Leslie Bernstein; Virginia Krawiec; Ernest Hawk; Joseph F O'Donnell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Milestones in mission: the work of the American Cancer Society's mission delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Sharpe; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Dawn Elise Wiatrek; Beverly Shaw
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Slow progress in cancer care disparities: HIPAA, PPACA, and CHEWBACCA... but we're still not there!

Authors:  Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011

7.  Health-Related Quality of Life of Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Review of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Chandylen L Nightingale; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Barbara A Curbow; Bradley J Zebrack; Kevin R Krull; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Variation in question asking during cancer clinical interactions: a potential source of disparities in access to information.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Felicity W K Harper; Louis A Penner; Marci J Gleason; Tanina Foster; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-04-28

Review 9.  Electronic medical records and quality of cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas R Klumpp
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Ambulatory visit utilization in a national, population-based sample of adults with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Miriam G Cisternas; Edward Yelin; Jeffrey N Katz; Daniel H Solomon; Elizabeth A Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.