Literature DB >> 19403700

Anterograde microtubule transport drives microtubule bending in LLC-PK1 epithelial cells.

Andrew D Bicek1, Erkan Tüzel, Aleksey Demtchouk, Maruti Uppalapati, William O Hancock, Daniel M Kroll, David J Odde.   

Abstract

Microtubules (MTs) have been proposed to act mechanically as compressive struts that resist both actomyosin contractile forces and their own polymerization forces to mechanically stabilize cell shape. To identify the origin of MT bending, we directly observed MT bending and F-actin transport dynamics in the periphery of LLC-PK1 epithelial cells. We found that F-actin is nearly stationary in these cells even as MTs are deformed, demonstrating that MT bending is not driven by actomyosin contractility. Furthermore, the inhibition of myosin II activity through the use of blebbistatin results in microtubules that are still dynamically bending. In addition, as determined by fluorescent speckle microscopy, MT polymerization rarely results, if ever, in bending. We suppressed dynamic instability using nocodazole, and we observed no qualitative change in the MT bending dynamics. Bending most often results from anterograde transport of proximal portions of the MT toward a nearly stationary distal tip. Interestingly, we found that in an in vitro kinesin-MT gliding assay, MTs buckle in a similar manner. To make quantitative comparisons, we measured curvature distributions of observed MTs and found that the in vivo and in vitro curvature distributions agree quantitatively. In addition, the measured MT curvature distribution is not Gaussian, as expected for a thermally driven semiflexible polymer, indicating that thermal forces play a minor role in MT bending. We conclude that many of the known mechanisms of MT deformation, such as polymerization and acto-myosin contractility, play an inconsequential role in mediating MT bending in LLC-PK1 cells and that MT-based molecular motors likely generate most of the strain energy stored in the MT lattice. The results argue against models in which MTs play a major mechanical role in LLC-PK1 cells and instead favor a model in which mechanical forces control the spatial distribution of the MT array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403700      PMCID: PMC2695801          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e08-09-0909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  51 in total

1.  Dynein motor regulation stabilizes interphase microtubule arrays and determines centrosome position.

Authors:  M P Koonce; J Köhler; R Neujahr; J M Schwartz; I Tikhonenko; G Gerisch
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in living cells expressing green fluorescent protein-alpha tubulin.

Authors:  N M Rusan; C J Fagerstrom; A M Yvon; P Wadsworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model.

Authors:  N Wang; K Naruse; D Stamenović; J J Fredberg; S M Mijailovich; I M Tolić-Nørrelykke; T Polte; R Mannix; D E Ingber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules.

Authors:  Dimitrije Stamenović; Srboljub M Mijailovich; Iva Marija Tolić-Nørrelykke; Jianxin Chen; Ning Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.249

5.  Microtubule dynamics depart from the wormlike chain model.

Authors:  Katja M Taute; Francesco Pampaloni; Erwin Frey; Ernst-Ludwig Florin
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Cdc42, dynein, and dynactin regulate MTOC reorientation independent of Rho-regulated microtubule stabilization.

Authors:  A F Palazzo; H L Joseph; Y J Chen; D L Dujardin; A S Alberts; K K Pfister; R B Vallee; G G Gundersen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  A mechanism for nuclear positioning in fission yeast based on microtubule pushing.

Authors:  P T Tran; L Marsh; V Doye; S Inoué; F Chang
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Focal loss of actin bundles causes microtubule redistribution and growth cone turning.

Authors:  Feng-Quan Zhou; Clare M Waterman-Storer; Christopher S Cohan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Filopodia and actin arcs guide the assembly and transport of two populations of microtubules with unique dynamic parameters in neuronal growth cones.

Authors:  Andrew W Schaefer; Nurul Kabir; Paul Forscher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Dual-wavelength fluorescent speckle microscopy reveals coupling of microtubule and actin movements in migrating cells.

Authors:  Wendy C Salmon; Michael C Adams; Clare M Waterman-Storer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  44 in total

1.  A systems-biology approach to yeast actin cables.

Authors:  Tyler Drake; Eddy Yusuf; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Cytoplasmic microtubule sliding: An unconventional function of conventional kinesin.

Authors:  Amber L Jolly; Vladimir I Gelfand
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Endocytic membrane fusion and buckling-induced microtubule severing mediate cell abscission.

Authors:  John A Schiel; Kristin Park; Mary K Morphew; Evan Reid; Andreas Hoenger; Rytis Prekeris
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Buckling behavior of individual and bundled microtubules.

Authors:  Mohammad Soheilypour; Mohaddeseh Peyro; Stephen J Peter; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Characterization of microtubule buckling in living cells.

Authors:  Carla Pallavicini; Alejandro Monastra; Nicolás González Bardeci; Diana Wetzler; Valeria Levi; Luciana Bruno
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation.

Authors:  Zhenjie Xu; Laura Schaedel; Didier Portran; Andrea Aguilar; Jérémie Gaillard; M Peter Marinkovich; Manuel Théry; Maxence V Nachury
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Lateral motion and bending of microtubules studied with a new single-filament tracking routine in living cells.

Authors:  Carla Pallavicini; Valeria Levi; Diana E Wetzler; Juan F Angiolini; Lorena Benseñor; Marcelo A Despósito; Luciana Bruno
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Deletion of both centrin 2 (CETN2) and CETN3 destabilizes the distal connecting cilium of mouse photoreceptors.

Authors:  Guoxin Ying; Jeanne M Frederick; Wolfgang Baehr
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Microtubule-based force generation.

Authors:  Ian A Kent; Tanmay P Lele
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  Single molecule imaging reveals differences in microtubule track selection between Kinesin motors.

Authors:  Dawen Cai; Dyke P McEwen; Jeffery R Martens; Edgar Meyhofer; Kristen J Verhey
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.