Literature DB >> 19403303

Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.

Seok-Ki Kim1, Hyuck Jae Choi, Sang-Yoon Park, Ho-Young Lee, Sang-Soo Seo, Chong Woo Yoo, Dae Chul Jung, Sokbom Kang, Kyung-Sik Cho.   

Abstract

We evaluated the additional diagnostic value of magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography (MR/PET) fusion in the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients. Seventy nine patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who had undergone both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before lymphadenectomy were included in this study. Image analysis was first performed with PET/CT images only. A second analysis was then performed with MR/PET fused images that focused on the additional information obtained from the MR images. Lymphadenectomy involved removing all visible lymph nodes in the surgical field. To enable nodal group-specific comparisons, para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes were divided into seven nodal groups: para-aortic, both common iliac, both external iliac and both internal iliac/obturator areas. Histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes has been the diagnostic standard. The value of the additional information from the MR images was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Fused MR/PET rendered readers to detect six more metastatic lymph node groups. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and fused MR/PET were 44.1%, 93.9% and 54.2%, 92.7% respectively. The ROC analysis demonstrated a higher diagnostic performance of fused MR/PET compared to PET/CT alone for detecting lymph node metastases (p=0.0259). The findings of this study demonstrate the additional diagnostic value of fused MR/PET images compared with PET/CT in the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403303     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  29 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of female pelvic malignancies regarding MRI, CT, and PET/CT : part 1.

Authors:  Kerstin A Brocker; Celine D Alt; Michael Eichbaum; Christof Sohn; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Peter Hallscheidt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Hybrid versus fusion imaging: are we moving forward judiciously?

Authors:  Luca Giovanella; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Integrated versus separate reading of F-18 FDG-PET/CT and MRI for abdominal malignancies - effect on staging outcomes and diagnostic confidence.

Authors:  Lisa A Min; Wouter V Vogel; Max J Lahaye; Monique Maas; Maarten L Donswijk; Erik Vegt; Miranda Kusters; Henry J Zijlmans; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sander Roberti; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Kazuya Nakajo; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Atsuo Inoue; Kayako Isohashi; Ichiro Higuchi; Hiroki Kato; Masao Imaizumi; Takayuki Enomoto; Eku Shimosegawa; Tadashi Kimura; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Competitive advantage of PET/MRI.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Nils F Schreiter; Munenobu Nogami; Ingo Steffen; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Bernd Hamm; Winfried Brenner; Rainer Röttgen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Ultrasound in gynecological cancer: is it time for re-evaluation of its uses?

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; David Cibula
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Johannes Grueneisen; Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Martin Heubner; Bahriye Aktas; Sonja Kinner; Michael Forsting; Thomas Lauenstein; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  PET/MRI and PET/CT in advanced gynaecological tumours: initial experience and comparison.

Authors:  Marcelo A Queiroz; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Nik Hauser; Bianka Freiwald-Chilla; Gustav von Schulthess; Johannes M Froehlich; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Francesco Buemi; Alessia Cassarà; Roberta Matheoud; Gian Mauro Sacchetti; Alberto Arnulfo; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.