Literature DB >> 19403076

Prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults.

Marina J Muñoz-Rivas1, José Luis Graña, K Daniel O'Leary, M Pilar González.   

Abstract

Dyadic influences among the diverse forms of aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults have been reported in various studies. The goal of this research was to extend a dyadic model of physical aggression against partners to sexual aggression against partners. An urban sample of 4,052 adolescents and young adults of both genders, between 16 and 26 years old, was used. The percentage of male aggressors was significantly higher than that of the females (35.7% vs. 14.9%) and the percentage of victimization was higher for the women (25.1% vs.21.7%). Sexual aggression and sexual victimization was almost solely psychological in nature, that is, verbal coercion. As predicted by the dyadic model of physical aggression in dating relationships, sexual victimization was best predicted by sexual aggression of the individuals in this study both for males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psicothema        ISSN: 0214-9915


  9 in total

1.  Designing an Internet Intervention for Emerging Adults Who Experience Troubled Relationships.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Donna S Martsolf; Stacey Crane; Lindsey Romero; Allison Leigh McCord
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.218

2.  Sexual dating aggression across grades 8 through 12: timing and predictors of onset.

Authors:  H Luz McNaughton Reyes; Vangie A Foshee
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2012-11-20

3.  The role of self-objectification and women's blame, sympathy, and support for a rape victim.

Authors:  Casey L Bevens; Amy L Brown; Steve Loughnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Personality characteristics of a sample of violent adolescents against their partners.

Authors:  María Penado Abilleira; María Luisa Rodicio-García; Tania Corrás Vázquez; María Paula Ríos de Deus; María Josefa Iglesias Cortizas
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2019-04-15

Review 5.  Big Boys Don't Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization.

Authors:  Joke Depraetere; Christophe Vandeviver; Tom Vander Beken; Ines Keygnaert
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2018-12-16

6.  Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Violence Exerted, Received, and Perceived in Teen Dating Relationships.

Authors:  Cordelia Estevez-Casellas; Mª Dolores Gómez-Medina; Esther Sitges
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Does Gottman's Marital Communication Conceptualization Inform Teen Dating Violence? Communication Skill Deficits Analyzed Across Three Samples of Diverse Adolescents.

Authors:  Heidi Adams Rueda; Monica Yndo; Lela Rankin Williams; Ryan C Shorey
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2018-11-28

8.  Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis.

Authors:  María Dosil; Joana Jaureguizar; Elena Bernaras; Juliana Burges Sbicigo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Perception of Dating Violence in Teenage Couples: A Cross Validation Study in Spain and Colombia.

Authors:  Ana Martínez-Dorado; Jesús Privado; Sergio A Useche; Lilian Velasco; Dau García-Dauder; Elisa Alfaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.