Literature DB >> 19402392

The effect of coupling coagulation and flocculation with membrane filtration in water treatment: a review.

TorOve Leiknes1.   

Abstract

Water supply and sanitation demands are foreseen to face enormous challenges over the coming decades to meet the fast growing needs in a global perspective. Significant growth in the industry is predicted and membrane separation technologies have been identified as one of the possible solutions to meet future demands. Application and implementation of membrane technology is expected both in production of potable water as well as in treatment of wastewater. In potable water production membranes are substituting conventional separation technologies due to the superior performance, potential for less chemical use and sludge production, as well as the potential to fulfill hygienic barrier requirements. Membrane bio-reactor (MBR) technology is probably the membrane process which has had most success and has the best prospects for the future in wastewater treatment. Trends and developments indicate that this technology is becoming accepted and is rapidly becoming the best available technology for many wastewater treatment applications. A major drawback of MBR systems is membrane fouling. Studies have shown that fouling mitigation in MBR systems can potentially be done by coupling coagulation and flocculation to the process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19402392     DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)        ISSN: 1001-0742            Impact factor:   5.565


  7 in total

1.  Treatment of secondary effluent by sequential combination of photocatalytic oxidation with ceramic membrane filtration.

Authors:  Lili Song; Bo Zhu; Veeriah Jegatheesan; Stephen Gray; Mikel Duke; Shobha Muthukumaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Treatment of a wastewater from a pesticide manufacture by combined coagulation and Fenton oxidation.

Authors:  G Pliego; J A Zazo; M I Pariente; I Rodríguez; A L Petre; P Leton; J García
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Nanoscale materials and their use in water contaminants removal-a review.

Authors:  Iram Mohmood; Cláudia Batista Lopes; Isabel Lopes; Iqbal Ahmad; Armando C Duarte; Eduarda Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Drinking water systems, hydrology, and childhood gastrointestinal illness in Central and Northern Wisconsin.

Authors:  Christopher K Uejio; Steven H Yale; Kristen Malecki; Mark A Borchardt; Henry A Anderson; Jonathan A Patz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Viral pathogens in water: occurrence, public health impact, and available control strategies.

Authors:  Kristen E Gibson
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Sorption based easy-to-use low-cost filters derived from invasive weed biomass for dye contaminated water cleanup.

Authors:  Smitha V Kamath; Halanur M Manohara; Kanakaraj Aruchamy; Ashok Shrishail Maraddi; Glenita Bridget D'Souza; Kuchangi Naraseeyappa Santhosh; K N Mahadevaprasad; S K Nataraj
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 7.  Sustainable mitigation of heavy metals from effluents: Toxicity and fate with recent technological advancements.

Authors:  Vivek Kumar Gaur; Poonam Sharma; Prachi Gaur; Sunita Varjani; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo; Preeti Chaturvedi; Reeta Rani Singhania
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.