Literature DB >> 19402150

Drilling and microfracture lead to different bone structure and necrosis during bone-marrow stimulation for cartilage repair.

Hongmei Chen1, Jun Sun, Caroline D Hoemann, Viorica Lascau-Coman, Wei Ouyang, Marc D McKee, Matthew S Shive, Michael D Buschmann.   

Abstract

Bone marrow stimulation is performed using several surgical techniques that have not been systematically compared or optimized for a desired cartilage repair outcome. In this study, we investigated acute osteochondral characteristics following microfracture and comparing to drilling in a mature rabbit model of cartilage repair. Microfracture holes were made to a depth of 2 mm and drill holes to either 2 mm or 6 mm under cooled irrigation. Animals were sacrificed 1 day postoperatively and subchondral bone assessed by histology and micro-CT. We confirmed one hypothesis that microfracture produces fractured and compacted bone around holes, essentially sealing them off from viable bone marrow and potentially impeding repair. In contrast, drilling cleanly removed bone from the holes to provide access channels to marrow stroma. Our second hypothesis that drilling would cause greater osteocyte death than microfracture due to heat necrosis was not substantiated, because more empty osteocyte lacunae were associated with microfracture than drilling, probably due to shearing and crushing of adjacent bone. Drilling deeper to 6 mm versus 2 mm penetrated the epiphyseal scar in this model and led to greater subchondral hematoma. Our study revealed distinct differences between microfracture and drilling for acute subchondral bone structure and osteocyte necrosis. Additional ongoing studies suggest these differences significantly affect long-term cartilage repair outcome. (c) 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19402150     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  58 in total

1.  Surgical technique: Second-generation bone marrow stimulation via surgical dislocation to treat hip cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Lisa M Tibor; Florian D Naal; Reinhold Ganz; Matthias R Steinwachs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jingzhou Yang; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kan Yue; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Subchondral screw abutment: does it harm the joint cartilage? An in vivo study on sheep tibiae.

Authors:  Michael Goetzen; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Daniel Arens; Stephan Zeiter; Ursula Eberli; Geoff Richards; Michael Blauth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Cartilage regeneration surgery on the hip : What is feasible?]

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Marcus Jäger; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Quality of Cartilage Repair from Marrow Stimulation Correlates with Cell Number, Clonogenic, Chondrogenic, and Matrix Production Potential of Underlying Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Garima Dwivedi; Anik Chevrier; Mohamad-Gabriel Alameh; Caroline D Hoemann; Michael D Buschmann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Jun-Ik Choi; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Microfracture for knee chondral defects: a survey of surgical practice among Canadian orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  John Theodoropoulos; Tim Dwyer; Daniel Whelan; Paul Marks; Mark Hurtig; Pankaj Sharma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Subchondral bone remodeling: comparing nanofracture with microfracture. An ovine in vivo study.

Authors:  Pietro Zedde; Sebastiano Cudoni; Giacomo Giachetti; Maria Lucia Manunta; Gerolamo Masala; Antonio Brunetti; Andrea Fabio Manunta
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-08-18

Review 9.  Autologous collagen induced chondrogenesis (ACIC: Shetty-Kim technique) - A matrix based acellular single stage arthroscopic cartilage repair technique.

Authors:  Asode Ananthram Shetty; Seok Jung Kim; Vishvas Shetty; Jae Deog Jang; Sung Woo Huh; Dong Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-14

10.  Repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee with autologous iliac crest cartilage in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Lizhong Jing; Jiying Zhang; Huijie Leng; Qinwei Guo; Yuelin Hu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.