BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to beta-lactams are a frequent cause of adverse drug reactions; the diagnosis is based on history, clinical examination, skin testing (prick and intradermal) and demonstration of serum-specific IgE antibodies (Abs). OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of the Phadia CAP system for the detection of IgE to beta-lactams carried out using the new test with cut-off limits of 0.10 kUA/L and the old test with cut-off limits of 0.35 kUA/L for positive results; subsequently, we analysed the effect of total serum IgE values and of atopic phenotype on the diagnostic performance of the tests. METHODS: The study comprised a total of 34 patients with a history of immediate adverse reactions to beta-lactams, which were confirmed by positive skin testing, and 115 control subjects with tolerance to beta-lactams over the last year. The Phadia CAP System was used for the determination of serum total and specific IgE Abs towards penicilloyl G (c1), penicilloyl V (c2), ampicilloyl (c5) and amoxicilloyl (c6). The overall diagnostic performance was assessed as a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). RESULTS: The new test showed a higher sensitivity (85% vs. 44%) than the old test and a lower specificity (54% vs. 80%) but the overall diagnostic performance was poor (DOR 6.78 vs. 3.16, P = 0.333) in both tests. The total IgE value influences the DOR of both tests; DOR was better for values under 200 kU/L [DOR = 66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.3-384.1] or 500 kU/L (DOR = 45.7; 95% CI: 5.3-394.4) for the new and old tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the positive cut off value has not significantly improved the overall diagnostic performance of the beta-lactams-specific IgE assay. Because of the influence of serum total IgE on the detection of beta-lactam-specific IgE Abs, the combination of both tests is mandatory in the in vitro diagnostic approach of beta-lactam allergy.
BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to beta-lactams are a frequent cause of adverse drug reactions; the diagnosis is based on history, clinical examination, skin testing (prick and intradermal) and demonstration of serum-specific IgE antibodies (Abs). OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of the Phadia CAP system for the detection of IgE to beta-lactams carried out using the new test with cut-off limits of 0.10 kUA/L and the old test with cut-off limits of 0.35 kUA/L for positive results; subsequently, we analysed the effect of total serum IgE values and of atopic phenotype on the diagnostic performance of the tests. METHODS: The study comprised a total of 34 patients with a history of immediate adverse reactions to beta-lactams, which were confirmed by positive skin testing, and 115 control subjects with tolerance to beta-lactams over the last year. The Phadia CAP System was used for the determination of serum total and specific IgE Abs towards penicilloyl G (c1), penicilloyl V (c2), ampicilloyl (c5) and amoxicilloyl (c6). The overall diagnostic performance was assessed as a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). RESULTS: The new test showed a higher sensitivity (85% vs. 44%) than the old test and a lower specificity (54% vs. 80%) but the overall diagnostic performance was poor (DOR 6.78 vs. 3.16, P = 0.333) in both tests. The total IgE value influences the DOR of both tests; DOR was better for values under 200 kU/L [DOR = 66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.3-384.1] or 500 kU/L (DOR = 45.7; 95% CI: 5.3-394.4) for the new and old tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the positive cut off value has not significantly improved the overall diagnostic performance of the beta-lactams-specific IgE assay. Because of the influence of serum total IgE on the detection of beta-lactam-specific IgE Abs, the combination of both tests is mandatory in the in vitro diagnostic approach of beta-lactam allergy.
Authors: I I Decuyper; E A Mangodt; A L Van Gasse; K Claesen; A Uyttebroek; M Faber; V Sabato; C H Bridts; C Mertens; M M Hagendorens; L S De Clerck; Didier G Ebo Journal: Drugs R D Date: 2017-06
Authors: Violeta Gil-Ocaña; Isabel M Jimenez; Cristobalina Mayorga; Inmaculada Doña; Jose Antonio Céspedes; Maria I Montañez; Yolanda Vida; Maria J Torres; Ezequiel Perez-Inestrosa Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Adriana Ariza; Cristobalina Mayorga; Gádor Bogas; Francesco Gaeta; María Salas; Rocco L Valluzzi; Marina Labella; Natalia Pérez-Sánchez; Cristiano Caruso; Ana Molina; Tahia D Fernández; María José Torres; Antonino Romano Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 6.208