Literature DB >> 19400677

Remember the source: dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memory.

David I Donaldson1, Mark E Wheeler, Steve E Petersen.   

Abstract

Event-related fMRI studies reveal that episodic memory retrieval modulates lateral and medial parietal cortices, dorsal middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior PFC. These regions respond more for recognized old than correctly rejected new words, suggesting a neural correlate of retrieval success. Despite significant efforts examining retrieval success regions, their role in retrieval remains largely unknown. Here we asked the question, to what degree are the regions performing memory-specific operations? And if so, are they all equally sensitive to successful retrieval, or are other factors such as error detection also implicated? We investigated this question by testing whether activity in retrieval success regions was associated with task-specific contingencies (i.e., perceived targetness) or mnemonic relevance (e.g., retrieval of source context). To do this, we used a source memory task that required discrimination between remembered targets and remembered nontargets. For a given region, the modulation of neural activity by a situational factor such as target status would suggest a more domain-general role; similarly, modulations of activity linked to error detection would suggest a role in monitoring and control rather than the accumulation of evidence from memory per se. We found that parietal retrieval success regions exhibited greater activity for items receiving correct than incorrect source responses, whereas frontal retrieval success regions were most active on error trials, suggesting that posterior regions signal successful retrieval whereas frontal regions monitor retrieval outcome. In addition, perceived targetness failed to modulate fMRI activity in any retrieval success region, suggesting that these regions are retrieval specific. We discuss the different functions that these regions may support and propose an accumulator model that captures the different pattern of responses seen in frontal and parietal retrieval success regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19400677     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  42 in total

1.  Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Age-related differences in prefrontal cortex activity during retrieval monitoring: testing the compensation and dysfunction accounts.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Jessica T Wong; David A Gallo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Kathleen M Arnold; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  High quality but limited quantity perceptual evidence produces neural accumulation in frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Ploran; Joshua J Tremel; Steven M Nelson; Mark E Wheeler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The effects of aging on material-independent and material-dependent neural correlates of source memory retrieval.

Authors:  Michael R Dulas; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Impaired perception of mnemonic oldness, but not mnemonic newness, after parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  Kylie H Hower; John Wixted; Marian E Berryhill; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of error-related activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Francis M Miezin; Steven M Nelson; Joseph W Dubis; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Alexander L Cohen; Jonathan D Power; Gagan S Wig; Francis M Miezin; Mark E Wheeler; Katerina Velanova; David I Donaldson; Jeffrey S Phillips; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Distributed representations in memory: insights from functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.