Literature DB >> 19400675

Individual differences in face cognition: brain-behavior relationships.

Grit Herzmann1, Olga Kunina, Werner Sommer, Oliver Wilhelm.   

Abstract

Individual differences in perceiving, learning, and recognizing faces, summarized under the term face cognition, have been shown on the behavioral and brain level, but connections between these levels have rarely been made. We used ERPs in structural equation models to determine the contributions of neurocognitive processes to individual differences in the accuracy and speed of face cognition as established by Wilhelm, Herzmann, Kunina, Danthiir, Schacht, and Sommer [Individual differences in face cognition, in press]. For 85 participants, we measured several ERP components and, in independent tasks and sessions, assessed face cognition abilities and other cognitive abilities, including immediate and delayed memory, mental speed, general cognitive ability, and object cognition. Individual differences in face cognition were unrelated to domain-general visual processes (P100) and to processes involved with memory encoding (Dm component). The ability of face cognition accuracy was moderately related to neurocognitive indicators of structural face encoding (latency of the N170) and of activating representations of both faces and person-related knowledge (latencies and amplitudes of the early and late repetition effects, ERE/N250 and LRE/N400, respectively). The ability of face cognition speed was moderately related to the amplitudes of the ERE and LRE. Thus, a substantial part of individual differences in face cognition is explained by the speed and efficiency of activating memory representations of faces and person-related knowledge. These relationships are not moderated by individual differences in established cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19400675     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sara J Webb; Emily J H Jones; Kristen Merkle; Michael Murias; Jessica Greenson; Todd Richards; Elizabeth Aylward; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Are event-related potentials to dynamic facial expressions of emotion related to individual differences in the accuracy of processing facial expressions and identity?

Authors:  Guillermo Recio; Oliver Wilhelm; Werner Sommer; Andrea Hildebrandt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  [Association between intelligence development and facial expression recognition ability in children with autism spectrum disorder].

Authors:  Ning Pan; Gui-Hua Wu; Ling Zhang; Ya-Fen Zhao; Han Guan; Cai-Juan Xu; Jin Jing; Yu Jin
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2017-03

5.  From neural signatures of emotional modulation to social cognition: individual differences in healthy volunteers and psychiatric participants.

Authors:  Agustín Ibáñez; Jaume Aguado; Sandra Baez; David Huepe; Vladimir Lopez; Rodrigo Ortega; Mariano Sigman; Ezequiel Mikulan; Alicia Lischinsky; Fernando Torrente; Marcelo Cetkovich; Teresa Torralva; Tristan Bekinschtein; Facundo Manes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Autistic Traits are Linked to Individual Differences in Familiar Voice Identification.

Authors:  Verena G Skuk; Romina Palermo; Laura Broemer; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-07

7.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: a replication and extension.

Authors:  Laura Kaltwasser; Andrea Hildebrandt; Guillermo Recio; Oliver Wilhelm; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  The 170ms Response to Faces as Measured by MEG (M170) Is Consistently Altered in Congenital Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Andreas Lueschow; Joachim E Weber; Claus-Christian Carbon; Iris Deffke; Tilmann Sander; Thomas Grüter; Martina Grüter; Lutz Trahms; Gabriel Curio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Individual differences in the recognition of facial expressions: an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Tamamiya; Kazuo Hiraki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preserved fine-tuning of face perception and memory: evidence from the own-race bias in high- and low-performing older adults.

Authors:  Jessica Komes; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.