Literature DB >> 19400587

Assembly and stability of the shiga toxins investigated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Elena N Kitova1, George L Mulvey, Tanis Dingle, Igor Sinelnikov, Stefanie Wee, Thomas P Griener, Glen D Armstrong, John S Klassen.   

Abstract

A systematic investigation into the assembly and stability of native and modified subunits of the Shiga toxins (Stx) in vitro is described. Analysis of the assembly of native and modified B subunits of Stx1 and Stx2 in solution, carried out using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ES-MS), suggests that the lower thermodynamic stability of the B subunit homopentamer of Stx2, compared to that of Stx1, is due to the presence of a repulsive interaction involving Asp70 of the Stx2 B subunit. In Stx1 B, the corresponding (spatially) residue is Arg. Using temperature-controlled ES-MS, it is shown that the Stx1 and Stx2 holotoxins exhibit differences in their resistance to temperature- and acid-induced dissociation. However, both Stx1 and Stx2 are fully assembled at pH >3.5 and 37 degrees C. This finding has several important biological implications. First, it argues against the likelihood that the difference in Stx1 and Stx2 toxicity arises from differential dissociation of the toxins during the intracellular trafficking steps of the cellular intoxication process. Second, it implies that the activation of the A subunits of Stx1 and Stx2 by enzymatic cleavage must occur while the A subunit is assembled with the B subunit homopentamer. It is, therefore, proposed that the differential toxicities of Stx1 and Stx2 reflect the relative efficiencies of intracellular activation of the A subunits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19400587     DOI: 10.1021/bi9003155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  7 in total

1.  Shiga toxin 1 is more dependent on the P proteins of the ribosomal stalk for depurination activity than Shiga toxin 2.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Chiou; Xiao-Ping Li; Miguel Remacha; Juan P G Ballesta; Nilgun E Tumer
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 5.085

2.  Top-down proteomic identification of Shiga toxin 2 subtypes from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-tandem time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Clifton K Fagerquist; William J Zaragoza; Omar Sultan; Nathan Woo; Beatriz Quiñones; Michael B Cooley; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of binding platforms yields insights into receptor binding differences between shiga toxins 1 and 2.

Authors:  Michael J Flagler; Sujit S Mahajan; Ashish A Kulkarni; Suri S Iyer; Alison A Weiss
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  AB5 Preassembly Is Not Required for Shiga Toxin Activity.

Authors:  Christine A Pellino; Sayali S Karve; Suman Pradhan; Alison A Weiss
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Molecular basis of differential B-pentamer stability of Shiga toxins 1 and 2.

Authors:  Deborah G Conrady; Michael J Flagler; David R Friedmann; Bradley D Vander Wielen; Rhett A Kovall; Alison A Weiss; Andrew B Herr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparisons of native Shiga toxins (Stxs) type 1 and 2 with chimeric toxins indicate that the source of the binding subunit dictates degree of toxicity.

Authors:  Lisa M Russo; Angela R Melton-Celsa; Michael J Smith; Alison D O'Brien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Method of Detecting and Distinguishing Type 1 and Type 2 Shiga-Like Toxins in Human Serum.

Authors:  Christopher J Silva; Melissa L Erickson-Beltran; Craig B Skinner; Stephanie A Patfield; Xiaohua He
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.