Literature DB >> 19399732

Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.

Nam-Joon Yi1, Kyung-Suk Suh, Hae Won Lee, Woo Young Shin, Juhyun Kim, Won Kim, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Hyo-Suk Lee, Kuhn Uk Lee.   

Abstract

Although adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has shown comparable outcomes to deceased donor liver transplantation, the outcome of patients with a high MELD score (>25) and a small-for-size graft (SFSG<0.8% of graft-to-recipient weight ratio) is not known. For 7 years, 167 consecutive hepatitis B virus-infected recipients underwent ALDLT at our institution. Based on their MELD score without additional score for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the recipients were divided into Group L (low MELD score, n = 105) or Group H (high MELD score, n = 62). To analyze the risk of the graft size, the patients were further stratified as follows: Group Hs (high MELD score and SFSG, n = 11), Hn (high MELD score and normal size graft, n = 51), Ls (low MELD score and SFSG, n = 18), and Ln (low MELD score and normal size graft, n = 87). The primary endpoint was one-year patient survival rate (1-YSR). The mean follow-up period was 32.6 months. The mean MELD scores were 17.1 in Group L and 32.6 in Group H. Group H had more patients with the complications of cirrhosis but less patients with HCC than Group L (p < 0.05). However, major morbidity rates and 1-YSR were similar in comparisons between Group L (46.7% and 86.7%) and H (59.7% and 83.8%) (p > 0.05). 1-YSR was similar among Group Hs (72.7%), Hn (86.3%), Ls (83.3%), and Ln (88.5%) groups (p = 0.278). The multivariate analysis revealed accompanying HCC and the year of transplant were risk factors for poor 1-YSR. However, 1-YSR without HCC patients was also similar in comparisons between group L (90.2%) and H (91.7%) (p = 0.847), and among Group Hs (80.0%), Hn (94.7%), Ls (72.7%), and Ln (96.7%) (p = 0.072). In conclusion, high MELD score (>25) didn't predict 1-YSR in ALDLT. Improvement of the 1-YSR might be affected by center's experience as well as the selection of patients with low risk of recurrence of HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399732     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  15 in total

1.  Using small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation recipients with high MELD scores should not be considered a contraindication.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Bo Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft.

Authors:  Masahiko Taniguchi; Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Satoru Todo; Hiroyuki Furukawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Outcome of patients undergoing right lobe living donor liver transplantation with small-for-size grafts.

Authors:  Pei-Xian Chen; Lu-Nan Yan; Wen-Tao Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Low-volume deceased donor liver transplantation alongside a strong living donor liver transplantation service.

Authors:  Kevin K W Chu; See Ching Chan; William W Sharr; Kenneth S H Chok; Wing Chiu Dai; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Spyridon Vernadakis; Andreas Paul; Dieter P Hoyer; Fuat H Saner; Anja Gallinat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Efforts to expand the donor pool for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Rupesh Sutaria; David H Adams
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-06-16

8.  Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Abigail R Smith; Michael Abecassis; Talia Baker; Jean C Emond; Carl L Berg; Charlotte A Beil; James R Burton; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; David R Grant; Abhinav Humar; Igal Kam; Robert M Merion; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Benjamin Samstein; Abraham Shaked
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Impact of Integrating Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Levels into Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score for Survival Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Reham Abdel-Wahab; Manal M Hassan; Bhawana George; Roberto Carmagnani Pestana; Lianchun Xiao; Sahin Lacin; Suayib Yalcin; Ahmed S Shalaby; Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Kanwal Raghav; Robert A Wolff; James C Yao; Lauren Girard; Abedul Haque; Dan G Duda; Simona Dima; Irinel Popescu; Hesham A Elghazaly; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Thomas A Aloia; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Yun Shin Chun; Asif Rashid; Jeffrey S Morris; Hesham M Amin; Ahmed O Kaseb
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Excellent outcome in 238 consecutive living donor liver transplantations using the right liver graft in a large volume single center.

Authors:  Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung-Suk Suh; Suk-Won Suh; Ye Rim Chang; Geun Hong; Tae Yoo; Hyeyoung Kim; Min Su Park; Young Rok Choi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Chul-Woo Jung; Jeong Hoon Lee; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Hyo-Suk Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.