Literature DB >> 19399641

Rich can get poor: conversion of hub to non-hub proteins.

Kyaw Tun1, Raghuraj Keshava Rao, Lakshminarayanan Samavedham, Hiroshi Tanaka, Pawan K Dhar.   

Abstract

Hubs are ubiquitous network elements with high connectivity. One of the common observations about hub proteins is their preferential attachment leading to scale-free network topology. Here we examine the question: does rich protein always get richer, or can it get poor too? To answer this question, we compared similar and well-annotated hub proteins in six organisms, from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. Our findings indicate that hub proteins retain, gain or lose connectivity based on the context. Furthermore, the loss or gain of connectivity appears to correlate with the functional role of the protein in a given system.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399641      PMCID: PMC2735643          DOI: 10.1007/s11693-009-9024-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Synth Biol        ISSN: 1872-5325


  30 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution.

Authors:  Eli Eisenberg; Erez Y Levanon
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 3.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization.

Authors:  Albert-László Barabási; Zoltán N Oltvai
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database.

Authors:  Gary D Bader; Doron Betel; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.

Authors:  Jing-Dong J Han; Nicolas Bertin; Tong Hao; Debra S Goldberg; Gabriel F Berriz; Lan V Zhang; Denis Dupuy; Albertha J M Walhout; Michael E Cusick; Frederick P Roth; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Some protein interaction data do not exhibit power law statistics.

Authors:  Reiko Tanaka; Tau-Mu Yi; John Doyle
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  How scale-free are biological networks.

Authors:  Raya Khanin; Ernst Wit
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Emergence of tempered preferential attachment from optimization.

Authors:  Raissa M D'Souza; Christian Borgs; Jennifer T Chayes; Noam Berger; Robert D Kleinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Preferential attachment in the evolution of metabolic networks.

Authors:  Sara Light; Per Kraulis; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data.

Authors:  Robert Gentleman; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Substitution scoring matrices for proteins - An overview.

Authors:  Rakesh Trivedi; Hampapathalu Adimurthy Nagarajaram
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.725

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.