Literature DB >> 19399524

[What is the difference between patients with and without complex postoperative acute pain therapy?: An analysis of medical and economic characteristics].

F-U Fricke1, N Hertel, N Kubitz, D Assenmacher, H Schreder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate postoperative pain therapy is essential for an accelerated recovery. However, coding complex acute pain therapy (OPS 8-919) does not have any impact on hospital revenues. As medical and economic primary data related to this therapy are scarce, hospital data were analysed to identify differences between patients with and without acute pain therapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two patient groups were generated out of an anonymized data set from 372 acute care hospitals in 2005: The case group (G1) included 4,197 patients (OPS 8-919 coded). The control group (G2) contained 61,181 patients (neither OPS 8-919 nor 8-910 nor 8-911 coded).
RESULTS: The analysis revealed that patients in G1 had a prolonged mean length of hospital stay (2.5 days). The mean number of diagnoses per case was similar in both groups (G1:6.9, G2:6.6), whereas the mean number of procedures was higher in G1 (G1:8.2, G2:6.2). The difference in mean diagnosis-related group (DRG) revenue per case was about EUR 200 (G1:EUR 9,233, G2:EUR 9,030).
CONCLUSION: To validate the results found in this analysis, further evaluations of these patient groups are essential. High-quality documentation and coding in hospitals are required for future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399524     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-009-0800-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  7 in total

1.  Acute pain management: analysis, implications and consequences after prospective experience with 6349 surgical patients.

Authors:  G Brodner; N Mertes; H Buerkle; M A Marcus; H Van Aken
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  [What is the value of pain therapy in the German refined diagnosis-related-groups system?].

Authors:  W Meissner; R Thoma; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain.

Authors:  J Hudcova; E McNicol; C Quah; J Lau; D B Carr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

4.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials.

Authors:  J C Ballantyne; D B Carr; T C Chalmers; K B Dear; I F Angelillo; F Mosteller
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  [Costs of patient controlled analgesia in postoperative pain management in Germany].

Authors:  L Stratmann; S Nelles; T Heinen-Kammerer; R Rychlik
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  [Pain treatment today--current standing of pain treatment in Germany].

Authors:  C Ostgathe; F Nauck; E Klaschik
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.698

7.  Cost drivers in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management after major surgery.

Authors:  Martin Schuster; André Gottschalk; Marc Freitag; Thomas Standl
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.108

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Anesthesiological acute pain therapy in Germany: telephone-based survey].

Authors:  C L Lassen; F Link; N Lindenberg; T W Klier; B M Graf; C Maier; C H R Wiese
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.