Literature DB >> 19398920

Interinstrument reliability of the RT3 accelerometer.

Michiel Reneman1, Miriam Helmus.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the interinstrument reliability of six RT3 accelerometers for measuring physical activities. Each of the six healthy participants, mean age 36.1 years (SD 9.4), carried six RT3 accelerometers (same type and same producer) simultaneously placed ventrally at the waist belt. The participants performed three standardized activities: walking on a treadmill at 3.0 km/h and 5.0 km/h, and sitting on a chair. Each activity lasted 5 min. The recordings of the accelerometers were compared with each other to assess interinstrument reliability. A correlation of 0.75 or higher was interpreted as sufficient. The mean Pearson correlation between the six accelerometers was r = 0.78 (0.46-0.97). The intraclass correlation between the accelerometers was 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.95, P <0.01). In conclusion, the interinstrument reliability of the RT3 accelerometer is sufficient. However, the lower limit of the confidence interval is low, indicating a challenge to the reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19398920     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32832c1e73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of physical activity among adolescents under free-living conditions: the HELENA study.

Authors:  Jérémy Vanhelst; Laurent Béghin; Alain Duhamel; Patrick Bergman; Michael Sjöström; Frédéric Gottrand
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 2.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Effect of varying accelerometry criteria on physical activity: the look ahead study.

Authors:  Gary D Miller; John M Jakicic; W Jack Rejeski; Melicia C Whit-Glover; Wei Lang; Michael P Walkup; Mimi L Hodges
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Hans Van Remoortel; Yogini Raste; Zafeiris Louvaris; Santiago Giavedoni; Chris Burtin; Daniel Langer; Frederick Wilson; Roberto Rabinovich; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Thierry Troosters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.