Literature DB >> 19398792

Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

S A Brennan1, J A Harty, C Gormley, S K O'Rourke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the quantity of bone removed from the acetabulum during resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: 62 consecutive patients with osteoarthritis of the hip were prospectively studied. 24 men and 7 women aged 40 to 86 (mean, 59) years underwent Birmingham hip resurfacing. 13 men and 18 women aged 34 to 88 (mean, 61) years underwent uncemented THA using the trident acetabular cup. Obese elderly women at risk of femoral neck fracture and patients with large subchondral pseudocysts or a history of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were assigned to uncemented THA. Acetabular reamings were collected; marginal osteophytes were not included. The reamings were dehydrated, defatted, and weighed.
RESULTS: The mean weight of acetabular reamings was not significantly different between patients undergoing hip resurfacing and uncemented THA (p=0.57).
CONCLUSION: In hip resurfacing, the use of an appropriately small femoral component avoids oversizing the acetabular component and removal of excessive bone stock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398792     DOI: 10.1177/230949900901700110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  2 in total

Review 1.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Using a Novel Mini-navigation System: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Ameer Elbuluk; Jessica R Benson; Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.