BACKGROUND: To improve the documentation and treatment of tobacco use in primary care, we developed and implemented a 3-part electronic health record enhancement: (1)smoking status icons, (2) tobacco treatment reminders, and (3) a Tobacco Smart Form that facilitated the ordering of medication and fax and e-mail counseling referrals. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the enhancement in 26 primary care practices between December 19, 2006, and September 30, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of documented smokers who made contact with a smoking cessation counselor. Secondary outcomes included coded smoking status documentation and medication prescribing. RESULTS: During the 9-month study period, 132 630 patients made 315 962 visits to study practices. Coded documentation of smoking status increased from 37% of patients to 54% (+17%) in intervention practices and from 35% of patients to 46% (+11%) in control practices (P < .001 for the difference in differences). Among the 9589 patients who were documented smokers at the start of the study, more patients in the intervention practices were recorded as nonsmokers by the end of the study (5.3% vs 1.9% in control practices; P < .001). Among 12 207 documented smokers, more patients in the intervention practices made contact with a cessation counselor (3.9% vs 0.3% in control practices; P < .001). Smokers in the intervention practices were no more likely to be prescribed smoking cessation medication (2% vs 2% in control practices; P = .40). CONCLUSION: This electronic health record-based intervention improved smoking status documentation and increased counseling assistance to smokers but not the prescription of cessation medication.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To improve the documentation and treatment of tobacco use in primary care, we developed and implemented a 3-part electronic health record enhancement: (1)smoking status icons, (2) tobacco treatment reminders, and (3) a Tobacco Smart Form that facilitated the ordering of medication and fax and e-mail counseling referrals. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the enhancement in 26 primary care practices between December 19, 2006, and September 30, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of documented smokers who made contact with a smoking cessation counselor. Secondary outcomes included coded smoking status documentation and medication prescribing. RESULTS: During the 9-month study period, 132 630 patients made 315 962 visits to study practices. Coded documentation of smoking status increased from 37% of patients to 54% (+17%) in intervention practices and from 35% of patients to 46% (+11%) in control practices (P < .001 for the difference in differences). Among the 9589 patients who were documented smokers at the start of the study, more patients in the intervention practices were recorded as nonsmokers by the end of the study (5.3% vs 1.9% in control practices; P < .001). Among 12 207 documented smokers, more patients in the intervention practices made contact with a cessation counselor (3.9% vs 0.3% in control practices; P < .001). Smokers in the intervention practices were no more likely to be prescribed smoking cessation medication (2% vs 2% in control practices; P = .40). CONCLUSION: This electronic health record-based intervention improved smoking status documentation and increased counseling assistance to smokers but not the prescription of cessation medication.
Authors: William C Wadland; Jodi Summers Holtrop; David Weismantel; Pramod K Pathak; Huda Fadel; Jeff Powell Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Maria Staroselsky; Lynn A Volk; Ruslana Tsurikova; Lisa P Newmark; Margaret Lippincott; Irina Litvak; Anne Kittler; Tiffany Wang; Jonathan Wald; David W Bates Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Scott E Sherman; Nancy Takahashi; Preety Kalra; Elizabeth Gifford; John W Finney; James Canfield; John F Kelly; George J Joseph; Ware Kuschner Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Cinnamon A Dixon; Lisa M Vaughn; Elena M Duma; Judith S Gordon Journal: J Emerg Nurs Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: Bradley N Collins; Stephen J Lepore; Jonathan P Winickoff; Uma S Nair; Beth Moughan; Tyra Bryant-Stephens; Adam Davey; Daniel Taylor; David Fleece; Melissa Godfrey Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: D Brad Rindal; William A Rush; Titus K L Schleyer; Michael Kirshner; Raymond G Boyle; Merry Jo Thoele; Stephen E Asche; Thankam Thyvalikakath; Heiko Spallek; Emily C U Durand; Chris J Enstad; Charles L Huntley Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker; Robin Mermelstein; Linda M Collins; David L Fraser; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Bruce A Christiansen; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Madeline Oguss; Michael C Fiore Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Aakash Bavishi; Matthew Bruce; Hongyan Ning; Priya M Freaney; Peter Glynn; Faraz S Ahmad; Clyde W Yancy; Sanjiv J Shah; Norrina B Allen; Suma X Vupputuri; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sadiya S Khan Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Gina R Kruse; Yuchiao Chang; Jennifer H K Kelley; Jeffrey A Linder; Jonathan S Einbinder; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.229