Literature DB >> 19398340

Differences between body movement adaptation to calf and neck muscle vibratory proprioceptive stimulation.

S Gomez1, M Patel, M Magnusson, L Johansson, E J Einarsson, P A Fransson.   

Abstract

Adaptation is essential in maintaining stability during balance-challenging situations. We studied, in standing subjects with eyes open and closed, adaptive responses of the anteroposterior head, shoulder, hip and knee movements; gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior EMG activity and anteroposterior body posture when proprioceptive information from the neck or calf muscles underwent vibratory perturbations. After 30s of quiet stance, vibratory stimuli were applied repeatedly for 200s, and adaption to stimulation was analyzed in four successive 50s periods. Repeated neck and calf vibration significantly increased linear body movement variance at all recorded sites (p<0.001, except neck stimulation with eyes closed, EC-neck), increased tibialis anterior (p<0.001, except EC-neck) and gastrocnemious muscle activity (p<0.001). Most body movement variances and tibialis anterior EMG activity decreased significantly over time (most p-values<0.01 or lower) and overall, the body leaning forward increased from 5.5 degrees to 6.5 degrees (p<0.01). The characteristics of the responses were influenced by vision and site of vibration, e.g., neck vibration affected body posture more rapidly than calf vibration. Our findings support the notion that proprioceptive perturbations have different effects in terms of nature, degree and adaptive response depending on site of vibratory proprioceptive stimulation, a factor that needs consideration in clinical investigations and design of rehabilitation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398340     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

1.  Short-term effect of neck muscle vibration on postural disturbances in stroke patients.

Authors:  Stéphanie Leplaideur; Emilie Leblong; Karim Jamal; Chloé Rousseau; Annelise Moulinet Raillon; Pauline Coignard; Mireille Damphousse; Isabelle Bonan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Local and global effects of neck muscle vibration during stabilization of upright standing.

Authors:  Julius Verrel; Rémy Cuisinier; Ulman Lindenberger; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Baseline skin information from the foot dorsum is used to control lower limb kinematics during level walking.

Authors:  Erika E Howe; Adam J Toth; Lori Ann Vallis; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Alcohol intoxication at 0.06 and 0.10% blood alcohol concentration changes segmental body movement coordination.

Authors:  M Patel; F Modig; M Magnusson; P A Fransson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Low intensity vibration of ankle muscles improves balance in elderly persons at high risk of falling.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Jane Mohler; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of a short-term and long-term whole-body vibration in healthy men upon the postural stability.

Authors:  Magdalena Piecha; Grzegorz Juras; Piotr Król; Grzegorz Sobota; Anna Polak; Bogdan Bacik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.